How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Total fractions split over the branches of a reduced hypersurface
Statement
Let , let and let be pairwise nonassociate irreducible germs in the holomorphic germ ring , with . Put
so that is a reduced product and is the hypersurface germ whose branches are the prime factors (Finite unique irreducible components of a hypersurface germ, Irreducible hypersurface germs and their components). Let be the total quotient ring of : the localisation at the multiplicative subset of the nonzerodivisors of (Total quotient ring and normalisation of a reduced plane curve germ). Then there is a ring isomorphism
where each is a domain and is its fraction field (The field of fractions of an integral domain). For this is the identity .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Pairwise nonassociate irreducible germs in , the reduced product , and with its nonzerodivisors .
The total quotient ring is for the set of nonzerodivisors of , with the localisation map (Total quotient ring and normalisation of a reduced plane curve germ).
is a unique factorisation domain: an integral domain in which every nonzero nonunit is a finite product of irreducibles, uniquely up to order and associates (The ring of holomorphic germs is a UFD, Unique factorisation domain).
Every irreducible germ is prime: implies or (Irreducible holomorphic germs are prime, Irreducible and prime elements of an integral domain); in particular each ideal is a prime ideal, so is a domain and its fraction field is defined (The field of fractions of an integral domain).
Pairwise nonassociate irreducibles are pairwise coprime in the UFD: if and , then with a unit, because otherwise both factors would be nonunits and would be reducible (Irreducible and prime elements of an integral domain, Unique factorisation domain).
Proof technique: direct — embed into the product of the branch rings, identify the nonzerodivisors, and construct the comparison isomorphism with explicit idempotent fractions.
Proof
Write for each and . Write for the -th component in of a class . The quotient map , , is well defined by [F2] and [F3], and its kernel is . By [F2] and [F3], an element lies in every exactly when each divides , and since the are pairwise nonassociate irreducibles this happens exactly when divides ; hence and is injective. Each is a domain by [F3], so the fraction fields exist.
For each let be the class of . Its -th component is nonzero in — it is a product of the nonzero classes of the , , in the domain by [F3] and [F4] — and its -th component vanishes for every . The sum therefore has for every . An element has all components nonzero in if and only if it is a nonzerodivisor: if for some , then with , so is a zerodivisor; conversely, if for all and for some , then in the domain gives for every , hence . Therefore , and in particular .
In the element is invertible, and the elements are orthogonal idempotents with : componentwise in one has and for , while , so , and in by the arithmetic of the localisation.
Define by . This is well defined: if in , then in for some , and applying the injective map of step 1.1 componentwise gives in the domain with , hence in . The map is a ring homomorphism, and it is injective: if , then for every , so by injectivity of , and in the localisation.
is surjective. Let , and for each write with and ; since is surjective onto , choose lifts of and . Put and . The element has all components nonzero: in the domain , and for one has ; hence by step 2.1 and is a legitimate fraction. Moreover has -th component and vanishes in every component , because the numerator has vanishing -th component. Therefore , so is surjective.
Together with step 3.2 this makes an isomorphism . For we have , is a domain by [F3], , and identifies with its fraction field, the ordinary case of the total quotient ring.
Depends on
- The field of fractions $\operatorname{Frac}(D)=(D\setminus\{0\})^{-1}D$ of an integral domain
- Irreducible and prime elements of an integral domain
- Irreducible hypersurface germs and their components
- Total quotient ring and normalisation of a reduced plane curve germ
- Unique factorisation domain
- Irreducible holomorphic germs are prime
- A germ is a unit exactly when its value at $0$ is nonzero, so $\mathcal O_{m,0}$ is local
- The ring of holomorphic germs is a UFD
- Finite unique irreducible components of a hypersurface germ
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jiří Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, Chapter 6 §§6.1–6.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jean-Pierre Demailly, Complex Analytic and Differential Geometry, Chapter II §§2, 4 and 6 (standard reference, not scraped)