Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A holomorphic function of several variables is continuous and separately holomorphic

Statement

Let U⊆Cm be open and let f:U→C be holomorphic (Holomorphic functions on an open subset of Cm). Then f is continuous on U and separately holomorphic on U (Separately holomorphic functions). Moreover, for a∈U and k<m the slice fa,k is complex differentiable at ak with derivative Df(a)ek, and

Df(a)ek=∂zkf(a),Df(a)h=∑k<m(∂zkf(a))hk.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open U⊆Cm and a holomorphic f:U→C; Cm is read through Complex m-space and its real coordinate dictionary.

[L1]

f is complex differentiable at a when there is a C-linear L with f(a+h)=f(a)+L(h)+r(h) and ∣r(h)∣/∥h∥→0; that L is unique and written Df(a) (Holomorphic functions on an open subset of Cm).

[L2]

f is separately holomorphic when every slice fa,k is holomorphic on the open set Ua,k in the one-variable sense (Separately holomorphic functions, Complex differentiability at a point, the complex derivative, holomorphic functions, and entire functions).

[L3]

An R-linear T:Cm→C has a unique representation T(h)=∑k<mckhk+∑k<mdkhk‾, and T is C-linear exactly when every dk=0; for T=Df(a) at a point of real total differentiability, ck=∂zkf(a) and dk=∂zˉkf(a) (A real-linear functional on Cm is complex linear exactly when its antiholomorphic part vanishes, Wirtinger operators in Cm).

[L4]

For every linear L:Rm→Rn there is K≥0 with ∥Lh∥2≤K∥h∥2 for every h (Every Euclidean linear map has a unique matrix and satisfies ∥Lh∥2≤K∥h∥2 for some K≥0).

[L5]

A complex differentiable function of one variable is continuous (Complex differentiability at a point implies continuity there).

[L7]

∣zw∣=∣z∣∣w∣ and ∣z+w∣≤∣z∣+∣w∣ (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive); finite sums are additive, scale and are monotone in their terms (Laws of finite sums and finite products).

[L8]

Continuity of a map into Rn from a subset of a metric space is the usual ε–δ condition with the Euclidean norm (Vector-valued functions f:A→Rm, their limits and continuity, with the dictionary to the metric notions).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L3L4L6L7

Fix a∈U and write L=Df(a) as in [L1]. Since L is C-linear it is in particular R-linear, so [L4] read through the dictionary gives K≥0 with ∣L(h)∣≤K∥h∥ for every h; alternatively [L3] and [L6] give L(h)=∑k<mckhk with ∣ck∣=∣L(ek)∣, and [L7] bounds ∣L(h)∣ by (∑k<m∣ck∣)∥h∥ because ∣hk∣≤∥h∥.

1.2givenL1

The remainder satisfies ∣r(h)∣/∥h∥→0 by [L1], so there is δ>0 with ∣r(h)∣≤∥h∥ whenever 0<∥h∥<δ and a+h∈U.

1.3givenL2

Fix k<m, let a∈U and let ζ∈Ua,k. The point a′ obtained from a by replacing its kth coordinate by ζ lies in U and agrees with a off the kth coordinate, so Ua′,k=Ua,k and fa′,k=fa,k.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2L7L8

Combining steps 1.1 and 1.2, ∣f(a+h)−f(a)∣≤∣L(h)∣+∣r(h)∣≤(K+1)∥h∥ for such h, which tends to 0 with ∥h∥; by [L8] this is continuity of f at a, and a∈U was arbitrary.

2.2step 1.3L1L2L6

With a′ as in step 1.3 and h=(ξ−ζ)ek for ξ near ζ, [L1] and [L6] give fa,k(ξ)−fa,k(ζ)=Df(a′)ek (ξ−ζ)+r(h), and ∥h∥=∣ξ−ζ∣ by the dictionary, so ∣r(h)∣/∣ξ−ζ∣→0. Hence fa,k is complex differentiable at ζ with derivative Df(a′)ek; as ζ∈Ua,k was arbitrary, the slice is holomorphic on Ua,k and f is separately holomorphic by [L2].

3.1step 2.1step 2.2L3L5L6∎

By [L3] applied to the C-linear Df(a), every dk vanishes and Df(a)h=∑k<mckhk with ck=Df(a)ek=∂zkf(a); step 2.2 at ζ=ak identifies that number with the derivative of the slice, and [L5] confirms the slice is continuous, consistently with step 2.1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

79 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources