Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The power sums of the slice zeros vary holomorphically

Statement

Under the neighbourhood and radius supplied by Nearby slices of a regular germ have the same zero count, define for each integer k0

pk(z):=12πiζ=rζkf/zm(z,ζ)f(z,ζ)dζ.

Then pk is holomorphic in z. If λ1(z),,λd(z) are the zeros of ζf(z,ζ) in ζ<r, counted with multiplicity, then

pk(z)=λ1(z)k++λd(z)k.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A representative of f on a neighbourhood of the closed cylinder V×{ζr} and the radius r and neighbourhood V from Nearby slices of a regular germ have the same zero count.

[L1]

Every slice ζf(z,ζ) has no zero on ζ=r and has exactly d interior zeros counted with multiplicity (Nearby slices of a regular germ have the same zero count).

[L2]

The derivative f/zm is holomorphic, holomorphic functions are separately holomorphic and continuous, and quotients by nonvanishing holomorphic functions stay holomorphic (Holomorphic functions of several variables are smooth and their complex derivatives are holomorphic, A holomorphic function of several variables is continuous and separately holomorphic, Sums, products and nonvanishing quotients of holomorphic functions are holomorphic).

[L3]

A contour integral with continuous integrand that is holomorphic in one complex parameter is holomorphic in that parameter (A contour integral of a jointly continuous, parameter-holomorphic integrand is holomorphic).

[L4]

A locally bounded separately holomorphic function is holomorphic (Locally bounded and separately holomorphic implies holomorphic).

[L5]

The weighted argument principle gives 12πiΓg(ζ)h(ζ)h(ζ)dζ=orda(h)g(a) for a holomorphic test function g and a zero-free boundary (The weighted argument principle).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the denominator f(z,ζ) is nonzero on V×{ζ=r}. Hence [L2] makes Φk(z,ζ):=ζkf/zm(z,ζ)f(z,ζ) continuous on that compact cylinder. Fixing all coordinates of z except one, [L2] makes Φk holomorphic in the remaining coordinate and [L3] makes the corresponding slice of pk holomorphic. The same compact continuity gives a uniform bound on Φk, so the ML estimate makes pk locally bounded on V. Therefore [L4] makes pk holomorphic on V.

L1L2L3L4
2.1

Fix zV and apply [L5] to the one-variable holomorphic function h(ζ):=f(z,ζ) on the disc ζ<r with test function g(ζ)=ζk. By [L1], the boundary circle is zero-free and the only singularities of h/h inside are the zeros λj(z), counted with their multiplicities. Thus pk(z)=j=1dλj(z)k.

givenL1L5

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources