Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Elementary row operations on an augmented matrix preserve exactly the solutions of its linear system

Statement

If an elementary row operation transforms the augmented matrix [A∣b] into [A′∣b′], then S(A,b)=S(A′,b′). Consequently every finite row reduction of an augmented matrix preserves its solution set exactly.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A system Ax=b over a field and one elementary row operation applied to its augmented matrix.

[L1]

Elementary row operations are swaps, nonzero row scalings and additions of a multiple of one row to another (Elementary row operations and row equivalence for finite matrices over a field).

[L3]

The system Ax=b consists of the row equations ∑j<naijxj=bi, and [A∣b] records their coefficients and right-hand sides (Matrix equation Ax=b, its solution set, consistency, homogeneous systems and the augmented matrix [A∣b]).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

A row swap only reorders equations; multiplying an equation by c≠0 preserves it in both directions after multiplication by c−1; and replacing one equation by itself plus c times another preserves simultaneous satisfaction because the added equation already holds. Thus every solution of the original system solves the transformed system.

L1L3algebra
2.1

Apply the same argument to the inverse operation from [L2] to obtain the reverse inclusion. Hence the solution sets are equal, without any assumption that A is square or invertible; iteration gives the finite-reduction claim.

step 1.1L2∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources