How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rudin spaces are collectionwise normal
Statement
Assume AC. For every infinite , is Hausdorff and collectionwise normal: for every indexed discrete family of closed subsets there are pairwise disjoint open sets with . Here indexed discreteness means each point has a neighborhood meeting at most one indexed member. In particular is normal. Empty members may receive empty neighborhoods.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Rudin space , ambient space , and AC.
Relative half-open boxes are clopen and give the local bases at Rudin and ambient points (Clopen boxes and the P-space property).
Every open cover of has a partition refinement into nonempty open boxes (Disjoint box refinements in the ambient Rudin space).
The ambient closures of an indexed discrete family of closed subsets of form an indexed discrete family in (Discrete Rudin families have discrete ambient closures).
AC is assumed, as required for the ambient refinement and closure-transfer constructions (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
If are distinct, choose a coordinate at which they differ, interchanging their names so . Set and for . Every point-coordinate is positive, so . The clopen box contains and excludes , since membership would require . Its open complement contains and is disjoint from . Thus is Hausdorff.
Let be an indexed discrete closed family in and put . By F3 and A1, each point of has an open neighborhood meeting at most one . Let be the set of all open subsets of with that property. It is an open cover by the preceding existence statement. F2 and A1 give a partition of into nonempty open boxes refining . Every cell meets at most one indexed , since it is contained in a member of .
For each define and . Each is open in , so is open in its subspace . If , the unique partition cell through meets because , and therefore . If , two partition cells assigned to and contain . They are the same cell by disjointness of the partition. Step 1.2 then gives . Thus the , and consequently the , are pairwise disjoint. For , also , so the displayed union gives . An empty index set produces the empty family.
Steps 1.1 and 2.1 give Hausdorffness and the stated collectionwise separation property. If are disjoint closed subsets of , their two-member indexed family is discrete: at a point of the open complement of meets at most , at a point of use the complement of , and elsewhere the intersection of both complements meets neither. Applying step 2.1 gives disjoint open neighborhoods of . Together with Hausdorffness this proves normality. QED.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. P. Hart, Set-Theoretic Methods in General Topology, Chapter 6 section 2, Exercise 8, printed p. 37 (standard reference, not scraped)