Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Schreier refinement theorem in an abelian category

Statement

Let

0=A0≤A1≤⋯≤Am=X,0=B0≤B1≤⋯≤Bn=X

be finite chains of subobjects in an abelian category. Then they admit refinements whose successive quotient objects can be paired up up to isomorphism.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two finite subobject chains displayed in the statement.

[F1]

A refinement is obtained by inserting intermediate subobjects, and two finite chains are equivalent when their nonzero successive quotient objects can be paired up up to isomorphism.

[L1]

Each cell in the refinement grid is governed by the butterfly lemma (Zassenhaus butterfly lemma in an abelian category).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1construct

For 0≤i<m and 0≤j≤n, define Ai,j:=Ai∨(Ai+1∧Bj). Then Ai,0=Ai and Ai,n=Ai+1, while Ai,j≤Ai,j+1 for every j. Concatenating the chains Ai=Ai,0≤Ai,1≤⋯≤Ai,n=Ai+1 over i=0,…,m−1 gives a refinement of the A-chain. Define Bj,i:=Bj∨(Bj+1∧Ai) symmetrically; concatenating those chains refines the B-chain.

2.1L1step 1.1

For every cell (i,j), apply [L1] to the pairs Ai≤Ai+1 and Bj≤Bj+1. It gives a canonical isomorphism Ai,j+1Ai,j≅Bj,i+1Bj,i. So the successive quotients of the two refinements are paired by the same grid.

3.1F1step 2.1∎

Some adjacent terms may coincide, producing zero successive quotients. By [F1], deleting those repetitions leaves equivalent refinements, and the quotient pairing from step 2.1 survives on every nonzero factor. Hence the original two chains admit equivalent refinements.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources