TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-16

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An endomorphism is an orthogonal projection exactly when it is idempotent and self-adjoint

Statement

An endomorphism $P$ of a finite-dimensional inner product space is the orthogonal projection onto some subspace if and only if

$P^{2} = P and P^{*} = P .$

In that case it is the orthogonal projection onto $im P$ , along $\ker P = (im P)^{⊥}$ . The cases $P = 0$ and $P = I$ are included.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An endomorphism $P$ of a finite-dimensional inner product space.

[L1]

Orthogonal projection onto $W$ is linear, idempotent, has image $W$ , and has kernel $W^{⊥}$ (Orthogonal projection is linear, and an orthonormal basis $(e_{i})$ of $W$ gives $P_{W} v = \sum_{i} ⟨ v, e_{i} ⟩ e_{i}$ ).

[L2]

The adjoint is characterised by $⟨ P v, w ⟩ = ⟨ v, P^{*} w ⟩$ and exists uniquely in finite dimension (The adjoint $T^{*} : W \to V$ is characterised by $⟨ T v, w ⟩_{W} = ⟨ v, T^{*} w ⟩_{V}$ , Every linear map between finite-dimensional inner product spaces has a unique adjoint).

[L3]

An orthogonal projection selects the subspace component in the orthogonal direct-sum decomposition (The orthogonal projection $P_{W} v$ is the $W$ -component in $V = W \oplus W^{⊥}$ ).

Proof

technique · direct

1.1

Suppose $P = P_{W}$ . By [L1], $P^{2} = P$ . Decompose both $v$ and $w$ into their $W$ and $W^{⊥}$ components. Orthogonality gives $⟨ P v, w ⟩ = ⟨ P v, P w ⟩ = ⟨ v, P w ⟩$ , so uniqueness in [L2] yields $P^{*} = P$ .

L1L2L3

1.2

Conversely, suppose $P^{2} = P$ and $P^{*} = P$ . Every $v$ has the algebraic decomposition $v = P v + (I - P) v$ , where $P v \in im P$ and $P (I - P) v = 0$ , so $(I - P) v \in \ker P$ .

givenalgebra

1.3

If $x = P u \in im P$ and $z \in \ker P$ , then [L2] and self-adjointness give $⟨ x, z ⟩ = ⟨ P u, z ⟩ = ⟨ u, P z ⟩ = 0$ . Thus $im P ⊥ \ker P$ .

L2given

2.1

Steps 1.2 and 1.3 show that $P$ selects the $im P$ component in the orthogonal decomposition $V = im P \oplus \ker P$ . By [L3], $P = P_{im P}$ , and [L1] identifies its kernel with $(im P)^{⊥}$ .

step 1.2step 1.3L1L3∎

Depends on

Used by

FALSE: Every idempotent endomorphism of an inner product space is an orthogonal projection False statement

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 27 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources

Sheldon Axler, Linear Algebra Done Right, 4th ed., §§6C and 7A (standard reference, not scraped)