How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Disjoint nonempty Euclidean convex sets have a separating hyperplane
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) and the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let and let be nonempty, disjoint, and convex. Then there is such that
Thus and are separated by a hyperplane in the sense of Supporting and strictly separating hyperplanes in Euclidean space. The inequality need not be strict when the two sets have distance zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The sets and choice principles in the Statement, convexity as in A convex subset of contains every line segment between two of its points, and the boundary convention Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space.
AC and supply the choice functions asserted in The Axiom of Choice and The Axiom of Countable Choice ().
A point outside a nonempty closed convex set can be strictly separated from it (A point outside a nonempty closed convex set is strictly separated from it).
Every boundary point of a nonempty convex set has a supporting hyperplane (Every boundary point belonging to a nonempty Euclidean convex set has a supporting hyperplane).
The closure of a nonempty convex subset of is convex (A convex set and its closure have the same interior and boundary).
Proof
Put . It is nonempty and convex and omits zero because . By [L3], is convex. Either , or and therefore , since an interior point of would belong to .
In the first case, apply [L1] to and ; in the second, [A1] licenses the hypotheses of [L2], which applies to at zero. Each branch gives a nonzero with for every . Substituting gives for all .
Depends on
- A point outside a nonempty closed convex set is strictly separated from it
- Every boundary point belonging to a nonempty Euclidean convex set has a supporting hyperplane
- A convex set and its closure have the same interior and boundary
- Supporting and strictly separating hyperplanes in Euclidean space
- A convex subset of $\mathbb{R}^m$ contains every line segment between two of its points
- Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization, §2.5.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- D. Bertsekas, MIT 6.253 Convex Analysis and Optimization, Lecture 7 (standard reference, not scraped)