Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Sheaves of sets are equivalent to local homeomorphisms over the base space

Statement

Let X be a topological space. A continuous map q:E→X is called a local homeomorphism if every point e∈E has an open neighbourhood W such that q(W) is open in X and q∣W:W→q(W) is a homeomorphism.

  1. For every sheaf of sets F on X, the projection p:E(F)→X of The etale space of a sheaf of sets is a local homeomorphism.
  2. For every local homeomorphism q:E→X, the assignment U⟼{ σ:U→E continuous:q∘σ=id⁡U } is a sheaf of sets on X.
  3. These two constructions are inverse up to natural isomorphism, so they give an equivalence between sheaves of sets on X and spaces over X whose structure map is a local homeomorphism.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A sheaf F on X, or a local homeomorphism q:E→X.

[F1]

The etale space E(F) is the disjoint union of the stalks with basic open sets [s,U], and p:[s,U]→U is a bijection (The etale space of a sheaf of sets).

[L1]

A sheaf is glued uniquely from compatible local sections on any open cover (A sheaf on a topological space).

[F2]

Morphisms of presheaves are given by restriction-compatible component maps (Morphisms of presheaves).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1L1

For a sheaf F, let p:E(F)→X be as in [F1]. If ξ=sx∈E(F), then ξ∈[s,U] for some section s∈F(U). By construction p:[s,U]→U is bijective. Its inverse x′↦sx′ is continuous because for any smaller basic open [t,V]⊆[s,U], the preimage is the open set {x′∈U∩V:sx′=tx′}, which is open by the sheaf locality encoded in [L1]. Hence p∣[s,U] is a homeomorphism onto the open set U. Since every point of E(F) lies in some [s,U], p is a local homeomorphism.

1.2L1given

Let q:E→X be a local homeomorphism, and let Sec⁡q(U) denote its continuous sections over an open set U. Restriction of a section is again a section, so Sec⁡q is a presheaf. If two sections of Sec⁡q(U) agree on an open cover, they are equal pointwise, so locality holds. If σi∈Sec⁡q(Ui) are compatible on an open cover U=⋃iUi, define σ(x)=σi(x) for x∈Ui. Compatibility makes this well defined, and continuity is local on the cover because each σi is continuous. Thus [L1] holds, so Sec⁡q is a sheaf.

1.3F1F2given

A sheaf morphism φ:F→G induces a map over X E(φ):E(F)⟶E(G),sx⟼(φU(s))x. This is well defined by restriction compatibility. It is continuous: if E(φ)(sx) lies in a basic open [t,V], equality of the two germs lets us shrink to an open W⊆U∩V on which φU(s)∣W=t∣W; then [s∣W,W] is a neighbourhood of sx mapped into [t,V]. Identities and compositions are preserved. Conversely, a map f:E→E′ over X between local homeomorphisms sends a section σ to f∘σ, naturally in the open set, and hence induces a sheaf morphism Sec⁡(f).

2.1F1L1step 1.1

For a sheaf F and an open set U, send s∈F(U) to the section θU(s):U⟶E(F),θU(s)(x)=sx. By step 1.1 this is continuous. If θU(s)=θU(t), then sx=tx for all x∈U, so [L1] gives s=t. Conversely, let σ:U→E(F) be a continuous section. For each x∈U, choose a basic open [sx,Vx] containing σ(x). Continuity makes Wx:=U∩Vx∩σ−1([sx,Vx]) an open neighbourhood of x. Since p is injective on [sx,Vx] and p∘σ=id⁡U, the restriction σ∣Wx equals y↦(sx)y. These local sections agree on overlaps because they induce the same map σ. By [L1], they glue to a unique s∈F(U) with θU(s)=σ. Thus θU is a bijection, natural in U.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 1.3∎

For a local homeomorphism q:E→X, define η:E⟶E(Sec⁡q) by sending e∈E to the germ at x=q(e) of any local section through e. Such a local section exists because q is a local homeomorphism, and two choices have the same germ because on a smaller common chart they are both the inverse of q. On a chart W→∼q(W), the map η is a homeomorphism from W onto the basic open defined by the inverse section. Hence η is an isomorphism over X. The formula E(φ)(sx)=(φU(s))x makes the bijections θ of step 2.1 natural in F, while the formula η(f(e))=(f∘σ)x makes η natural in E. Thus the two functors constructed in steps 1.2 and 1.3 are quasi-inverse equivalences.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources