Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Splitting lemma for groups: a section, a complement, and a semidirect-product decomposition are equivalent

Statement

For a short exact sequence

1→N→iG→πH→1,

the following are equivalent:

  1. there is a homomorphic section s:H→G of π;
  2. ker⁡π has a complement K in G;
  3. G is isomorphic to (ker⁡π)⋊H by an isomorphism compatible with the injection and quotient maps.

For a section s, the action is h⋅n=s(h)ns(h)−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The displayed short exact sequence.

[L1]

A section satisfies πs=id⁡H, and a complement K satisfies G=(ker⁡π)K and (ker⁡π)∩K={1} (Group extensions, sections, complements, and split extensions).

[L2]

An internal semidirect product is isomorphic to the external product defined by its conjugation action ( Recognition theorem: G=NH with N⊴G, N∩H=1 exactly realises an external semidirect product).

[L3]

The first isomorphism theorem identifies the quotient by a kernel with the image (First isomorphism theorem for groups: G/ker⁡f≅im⁡f).

[L4]

A homomorphism is injective exactly when its kernel is trivial (A group homomorphism is injective if and only if its kernel is trivial).

Proof

technique · iff
1.1L1L4

Suppose s is a section and put K=s(H). If s(h)∈ker⁡π, then h=πs(h)=1, so s is injective by [L4] and K∩ker⁡π={1}.

1.2L1L3L4

Conversely, suppose K is a complement. The restriction π∣K is injective because its kernel is K∩ker⁡π, and it is surjective because G=(ker⁡π)K and π kills the first factor. Thus it is an isomorphism by [L3] and [L4].

2.1step 1.1L1L2

For g∈G, put h=π(g). Then gs(h)−1∈ker⁡π, so g∈(ker⁡π)K. Hence K is a complement, and [L2] gives the compatible semidirect-product decomposition with the stated conjugation action.

3.1step 1.2L1L2∎

The inverse s=(π∣K)−1:H→K↪G is a homomorphic section. Finally, any compatible external semidirect decomposition supplies its canonical complement and hence a section by the same construction.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources