How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
SRSWOR inclusion covariance and sample-mean variance
Statement
Let be a finite population of size , and draw an SRSWOR sample of size , where . Write if and otherwise. Define For distinct , and Both formulas include and the census case .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite population with fixed real values, , and a uniform design on the -element subsets of for an integer .
Finite populations and sampling designs: The population values are fixed; the design defines , , , design expectation, the total , and the population mean .
Simple random sampling without replacement: Every -element subset is in the design support and has probability .
Horvitz–Thompson variance and pair-inclusion estimate: When , the design variance of is .
Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: Covariance is the expectation of the product of centered variables; variance is covariance with itself.
Proof
There are supported samples; a fixed unit occurs in of them, so . If , no sample contains distinct ; if , samples contain them, hence in either case for .
By [F1], and , while ; expanding [F5] gives . Substitution from step 1.1 gives for .
Since , ; by [F4], . From , , and step 2.1 gives for ; thus .
When , the sample is the population and the factor is zero. When , step 3.1 gives ; the usual sample variance denominator is unavailable, but the design variance is defined.
Remarks
The PDF p. 14 covariance display in Shalabh's Chapter 2 has a positive-sign typo. The inclusion probabilities on that page and the defining identity give the negative value proved above. The sample space has only points, so the design distribution is finitely supported; the displayed variance alone is not an exact normal or calibration.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Shalabh, Sampling Theory, Chapter 2: Simple Random Sampling, PDF pp. 1–15 (standard reference, not scraped)