Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

SRSWOR inclusion covariance and sample-mean variance

Statement

Let (U,y) be a finite population of size N>1, and draw an SRSWOR sample S of size n, where 1≤n≤N. Write Ii=1 if i∈S and Ii=0 otherwise. Define yˉU:=1N∑i∈Uyi,yˉS:=1n∑i∈Syi,SU2:=1N−1∑i∈U(yi−yˉU)2. For distinct i,j∈U, Cov⁡d(Ii,Ij)=−n(N−n)N2(N−1), and Var⁡d(yˉS)=(1−nN)SU2n. Both formulas include n=1 and the census case n=N.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite population with fixed real values, N>1, and a uniform design on the n-element subsets of U for an integer 1≤n≤N.

[F1]

Finite populations and sampling designs: The population values are fixed; the design defines Ii, πi, πij, design expectation, the total T(y)=∑iyi, and the population mean yˉU=T(y)/N.

[F2]

Simple random sampling without replacement: Every n-element subset is in the design support and has probability (Nn)−1.

[F3]

Inclusion-covariance difference: Δij=πij−πiπj.

[F4]

Horvitz–Thompson variance and pair-inclusion estimate: When πi>0, the design variance of ∑iIiyi/πi is ∑i,jΔijyiyj/(πiπj).

[F5]

Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: Covariance is the expectation of the product of centered variables; variance is covariance with itself.

Proof

1.1givenF2choosealgebra

There are (Nn) supported samples; a fixed unit occurs in (N−1n−1) of them, so πi=n/N. If n=1, no sample contains distinct i,j; if 2≤n≤N, (N−2n−2) samples contain them, hence in either case πij=n(n−1)/(N(N−1)) for i≠j.

2.1F1F3F5step 1.1algebra

By [F1], Ed[Ii]=πi and Ed[IiIj]=∑s:i,j∈spd(s)=πij, while πii=πi; expanding [F5] gives Cov⁡d(Ii,Ij)=Ed[IiIj]−Ed[Ii]Ed[Ij]=πij−πiπj=Δij. Substitution from step 1.1 gives Cov⁡d(Ii,Ij)=n(n−1)N(N−1)−n2N2=−n(N−n)N2(N−1) for i≠j.

3.1F1F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Since πi=n/N, N−1∑iIiyi/πi=yˉS; by [F4], Var⁡d(yˉS)=1N2(∑iΔiiyi2πi2+∑i≠jΔijyiyjπi2). From πii=πi, Δii/πi2=(N−n)/n, and step 2.1 gives Δij/πi2=−(N−n)/(n(N−1)) for i≠j; thus Var⁡d(yˉS)=N−nN2n(∑iyi2−1N−1∑i≠jyiyj)=N−nN2nN∑iyi2−(∑iyi)2N−1=N−nNnSU2.

4.1F1F2step 3.1algebra∎

When n=N, the sample is the population and the factor 1−n/N is zero. When n=1, step 3.1 gives (1−1/N)SU2; the usual sample variance denominator n−1 is unavailable, but the design variance is defined.

Remarks

The PDF p. 14 covariance display in Shalabh's Chapter 2 has a positive-sign typo. The inclusion probabilities on that page and the defining identity Cov⁡(Ii,Ij)=πij−πiπj give the negative value proved above. The sample space has only (Nn) points, so the design distribution is finitely supported; the displayed variance alone is not an exact normal or t calibration.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources