Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Entropy-rate limit for a stationary finite-alphabet source

Statement

Proves that n^{-1}H(X_0,...,X_{n-1}) converges under stationarity and equals the limit of the finite-past conditional entropies.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A stationary finite-alphabet source (Xi)i∈Z and Hn=H(X0n−1).

[F1]

Finite-alphabet stationary source: every shifted finite block has the same law as the original block.

[F2]

Finite-block information and entropy in bits: Hn is the Shannon entropy of the length-n block.

[F3]

Finite entropy chain rule and monotonicity under conditioning: joint block entropy is the sum of successive conditional entropies, and conditioning on additional finite-valued variables cannot increase conditional entropy.

[F4]

Information rate of a general finite-alphabet process: for a finite-alphabet process, 0≤Hn/n≤log⁡2∣A∣.

Proof

Given: The source and [F1]–[F3].

1.1F1F2F3given

By the chain rule, H(X0n+m−1)=H(X0n−1)+H(Xnn+m−1∣X0n−1)≤Hn+Hm. The inequality follows because conditioning cannot increase entropy, and stationarity makes H(Xnn+m−1)=Hm. Thus (Hn) is subadditive.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Fix k≥1 and write n=ak+r with 0≤r<k. Repeated subadditivity gives Hn≤aHk+Hr, where H0=0 and the finitely many Hr are bounded by klog⁡2∣A∣. Hence lim sup⁡nHn/n≤Hk/k. Since Hn/n≥inf⁡j≥1Hj/j, taking the infimum over k proves the limit exists and equals h=inf⁡k≥1Hk/k.

3.1F1F2F3F4step 2.1algebra∎

For each k≥0, put ak=H(X0∣X−k−1), with a0=H(X0) for the empty past. By the conditioning monotonicity in [F3], (ak) is nonincreasing; it is bounded below by zero, so it has a limit a∞. The chain rule gives Hn=∑i=0n−1H(Xi∣X0i−1). By stationarity [F1], H(Xi∣X0i−1)=H(X0∣X−i−1)=ai. Therefore Hn/n=n−1∑i=0n−1ai→a∞ by Ces`aro convergence. Comparing with the limit h from step 2.1 yields h=a∞, the limit of finite-past conditional entropies. By [F4], h is finite and lies in [0,log⁡2∣A∣], including deterministic sources with h=0.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources