Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Componentwise Shannon–McMillan–Breiman theorem

Statement

For every stationary finite-alphabet source, proves -n^{-1}log_2 P(X_0^{n-1}) converges almost surely and in L1 to the invariant Birkhoff limit of infinite-past information density, with mean equal to the entropy rate in bits.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A stationary finite-alphabet source X over A, entropy rate h, and gk,g∞ from Finite-past information densities.

[F1]

Convergence and integrable envelope for finite-past information: gk→g∞ almost surely, g∞∈L1, and Eg∞=h.

[F2]

Triangular averages of finite-past information converge to the infinite-past average: under the integrable envelope, n−1∑i<ngi(Tix) and n−1∑i<ng∞(Tix) have the same almost-sure limit.

[F3]

Birkhoff pointwise ergodic theorem: time averages of g∞ converge almost surely to an invariant integrable limit.

[F4]

Ergodic averages converge in Lp on finite-measure spaces: those averages converge in L1 on the probability space.

Proof

Given: The source and [F1]–[F4].

1.1F1givenalgebra

The chain rule for finite block probabilities gives, almost surely, −log⁡2P(X0n−1)=∑i=0n−1−log⁡2P(Xi∣X0i−1)=∑i=0n−1gi(TiX). The equality holds on positive-probability blocks; their complement has probability zero.

2.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1

By [F3]–[F4], Ang∞=n−1∑i<ng∞(TiX) converges almost surely and in L1 to an invariant random variable G∗. By [F2] and step 1.1, the difference between −n−1log⁡2P(X0n−1) and Ang∞ tends to zero almost surely and in L1. This proves both asserted modes of convergence.

3.1F1F4step 2.1algebra∎

The L1 convergence [F4] implies EG∗=Eg∞=h; the limit is therefore finite and has mean equal to the stationary entropy rate. It need not be constant without ergodicity.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources