Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Invariant conditional-entropy description of the SMB limit

Statement

Under AC, identifies the componentwise SMB limit with E[g_infinity|I], conditional expectation of infinite-past information given the invariant sigma-algebra.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a stationary finite-alphabet source, its invariant sigma-algebra I={E:T−1E=E}, and g∞ from Finite-past information densities.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC is assumed only for the published finite-measure Birkhoff-limit identification used below.

[F1]

Componentwise Shannon–McMillan–Breiman theorem: the block information limit is the Birkhoff limit of g∞.

[F2]

Finite-measure identification of the Birkhoff limit: under AC, the Birkhoff limit integrates like the function over every strict invariant event.

[F3]

Conditional expectation given a sigma algebra: conditional expectation is characterized by measurability and equality of integrals on all events in the conditioning sigma-algebra.

[F4]

Strict and mod-null invariant sigma-algebras: the strict invariant sigma-algebra consists of events E satisfying T−1E=E.

Proof

Given: AC, the source, g∞ and the strict invariant sigma-algebra.

1.1A1F1F2F4given

The function g∞ is integrable by [F1]. Apply [F2] to its Birkhoff limit G∗ on the probability-preserving shift: G∗ has an I-measurable representative and ∫EG∗ dP=∫Eg∞ dP for every E∈I.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

These are exactly the defining tests in [F3] for E[g∞∣I]. Hence G∗=E[g∞∣I] almost surely, and the componentwise SMB limit has this description by [F1]. AC is used only through [F2]; the componentwise SMB theorem itself does not use this identification.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources