Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Tangent spaces and Frobenius projections on Stiefel and Grassmann

Statement

For X∈St⁡(n,r), the tangent space and its Frobenius orthogonal projection are TXSt⁡(n,r)={Z:XTZ+ZTX=0},ΠXSt(G)=G−Xsym⁡(XTG). For [X]∈Gr⁡(r,n), its tangent vectors have unique horizontal representatives Z with XTZ=0, and the quotient-metric projection of an ambient G to this horizontal space is ΠXGr(G)=(I−XXT)G.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: 1≤r≤n, XTX=Ir, and the Frobenius metrics of Real Stiefel and Grassmann optimization conventions.

[F1]

The Stiefel constraint map is F(X)=XTX−Ir, and the Grassmannian is the quotient of orthonormal frames by the right orthogonal action (Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles).

[F2]

At a regular level, the tangent space is the kernel of the differential (The tangent space of a regular level set is the kernel).

Proof

technique · differentiate the Stiefel constraint and orthogonally decompose matrices
1.1F1F2givenalgebra

The derivative of F at X is DFX[Z]=XTZ+ZTX. It is onto the symmetric matrices because for any symmetric H, the choice Z=XH/2 gives DFX[Z]=H. Thus 0 is a regular value; [F2] identifies the tangent space with the displayed kernel.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

Write S=sym⁡(XTG). Then XT(G−XS)+(G−XS)TX=0, so G−XS is tangent. For every symmetric H and tangent Z, ⟨XH,Z⟩F=tr⁡(HXTZ)=0 because XTZ is skew-symmetric. Hence XS is normal and G−XS is the orthogonal projection.

2.2F1givenstep 1.1algebra

A curve Q(t) in O⁡(r) through Ir has Ω=Q′(0) skew-symmetric by differentiating Q(t)TQ(t)=Ir. Conversely, for any skew-symmetric Ω, the Cayley curve Q(t)=(Ir−t2Ω)−1(Ir+t2Ω) is defined near zero, satisfies Q(t)TQ(t)=Ir, and has Q(t)=Ir+tΩ+O(t2); hence the vertical tangent directions are exactly XΩ. Every Stiefel tangent Z decomposes as Z=XΩ+(I−XXT)Z, where Ω=XTZ is skew and the second term is horizontal. These summands are orthogonal, so the quotient tangent is represented uniquely by the horizontal summand.

3.1F1givenstep 2.2algebra∎

The matrix (I−XXT)G is horizontal. For every horizontal Z, ⟨G−(I−XXT)G,Z⟩F=⟨XXTG,Z⟩F=0, since XTZ=0. Therefore it is the quotient-metric projection. Under X↦XQ and G↦GQ it becomes (I−XXT)GQ, the same tangent vector in the changed representative.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources