How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The regular open completion of a Boolean algebra
Statement
Assume BPI over ZF. The map , , is an order-dense Boolean embedding into a complete Boolean algebra and preserves every existing supremum and infimum in , including empty ones. For any two order-dense Boolean embeddings and into complete Boolean algebras there is exactly one Boolean isomorphism satisfying .
Facts & Assumptions
Regular open algebra in ZF gives the complete regular-open algebra, with ordinary intersection as finite meet and interior of complement as Boolean complement.
Stone clopen representation under BPI identifies with the clopen algebra of its Stone space under BPI; the basic sets form a clopen basis.
Proof
Given: BPI and a Boolean algebra , allowing .
Put . Every clopen is regular open since . On clopens the operations of F1 give ordinary intersections, complements and finite unions, because these sets are already clopen. Thus F2 gives a Boolean embedding , whose codomain is complete by F1. If is nonempty, take one and a basic clopen with . This makes and proves order density.
We record two consequences of order density using only Boolean laws. Let be any order-dense Boolean embedding with complete. For put . Then . If strict, density gives . But puts , a contradiction. Thus . Next suppose exists. The element is at most . If , density gives . Order reflection implies and for every . Then is an upper bound of strictly below , contradicting its least-upper-bound property. Therefore . Complements convert existing infima to suprema and show their preservation as well. The calculation includes , since its supremum is zero and embeddings preserve bounds.
Applying step 1.2 to the embedding of step 1.1 proves the claimed preservation of existing bounds. To prove uniqueness of completions, take the stated and and define . Completeness of defines this value uniquely for every ; monotonicity follows from inclusion of the indexing sets. If , then . Conversely suppose . Choose by density . For every with , , so and hence . But , so . We have proved the exact cut identity iff .
Define symmetrically . The cut identity gives by step 1.2. Interchanging the roles of the two embeddings gives the reverse cut identity and . Both maps are monotone, so they are inverse order isomorphisms. An order isomorphism preserves bounds and least/greatest bounds: applying its inverse to any competing bound reduces the required inequality to the original least/greatest property. It therefore preserves binary joins and meets; it also preserves complements, since the image of the complement has meet zero and join one with the image element, and complements are unique in a Boolean algebra. Thus is a Boolean isomorphism. For , every index with satisfies , and itself is included, giving .
Any Boolean isomorphism over is an order isomorphism and hence preserves every supremum by the bound argument of step 3.1. The dense-supremum equality of step 1.2 forces for all , proving uniqueness. If is trivial, its Stone space is empty and the regular-open algebra is trivial. Any bound-preserving embedding from this forces and likewise for , so the uniqueness statement also holds there. The only selections in the proof are one point and one basic neighborhood or one nonzero dense element at a time; no AC is needed beyond the explicit BPI hypothesis for F2. QED.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Fremlin, Measure Theory, 314T(a) and 314U, Chapter 31, pp. 40–41; local dense-cut uniqueness proof (standard reference, not scraped)