Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The subfields of Fpn are the unique fields Fpd for positive divisors d of n

Statement

Let F be a field of order pn. For each positive divisor d of n, F has exactly one subfield of order pd, namely

Fd={a∈F:apd=a}.

These are all the subfields of F.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite field F of order pn.

[L2]

A finite field has prime-power order, and its exponent is its degree over the prime field (Every finite field has order pn for a unique prime characteristic p and positive integer n).

[L3]

The roots of tpd−t form a subfield and are simple (In characteristic p, the roots of xpn−x form a subfield and are all simple).

[L4]

A field of order pr is the full root set and splitting field of tpr−t (A field with q elements is the splitting field of xq−x over its prime subfield).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L2

If K⊆F is a subfield, [L2] gives ∣K∣=pd and degrees [K:Fp]=d, [F:Fp]=n. The tower law [L1] gives d∣n.

1.2givenalgebra

Now let d∣n and write n=ed. In characteristic p, put Pr(t)=tprd−t. The identity Pr+1=Prpd+(tpd−t) shows inductively that tpd−t divides tpn−t.

2.1step 1.2L3L4

By [L4], tpn−t splits in F. Hence its degree-pd divisor from step 1.2 splits there too. By [L3], its roots are distinct and form the subfield Fd, so ∣Fd∣=pd.

3.1step 2.1L4

If K⊆F has order pd, every element of K satisfies apd=a by [L4], so K⊆Fd. Both sets have pd elements, hence K=Fd.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 give existence exactly for positive divisors d of n, and step 3.1 gives uniqueness and exhausts all subfields.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources