How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Spencer's quantum-characteristic criterion for Jones–Wenzl existence
Statement
Let be a field, , let be the quantum characteristic from Temperley–Lieb quantum integers and quantum characteristic, and let (write in characteristic zero). A normalized idempotent satisfying and for every exists exactly in the following cases:
- if , every finite satisfies the criterion ;
- if and is finite, then or for some and integer ;
- if and , then or for some positive integer .
The criterion is over fields. It does not assert descent to an arbitrary coefficient ring.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The field , its loop parameter, rank , recurrence quantum characteristic , and characteristic parameter in the Statement. Here is the augmentation taking the coefficient of the identity diagram, as in the quantum-binomial criterion below.
A normalized idempotent annihilated by all exists over a field exactly when every quantum-binomial polynomial , , is nonzero; the proof establishes the equivalence over every field and makes no integral-ring descent claim (Jones–Wenzl existence over a field is detected by one quantum-binomial row).
Full-row nonvanishing is equivalent to the exact three quantum-characteristic/characteristic branches in the Statement (Nonvanishing of an entire quantum-binomial row and the characteristic digits, with as in Temperley–Lieb quantum integers and quantum characteristic).
Proof
Given: The data in the Statement.
By [F1], existence of the normalized annihilating idempotent is equivalent to nonvanishing of every . The hypotheses of [F1] are exactly a field, its loop parameter and a nonnegative rank, so this equivalence includes arbitrary positive characteristic and the zero-loop case.
Apply [F2] to that same field and the recurrence parameter . It gives every finite rank when ; for finite and positive characteristic it gives or with and ; and in characteristic zero it gives or for any positive integer . These are precisely the three asserted cases, so the equivalence in step 1.1 proves both directions without narrowing any branch.
Remarks
The proof uses an integral diagram representation and an explicit quantum-binomial zero-pattern argument. It does not infer arbitrary-field behavior from the ordinary generic quantum-group centralizer theorem, and does not claim the full Spencer composition-factor classification. The latter is a substantially richer theorem unnecessary for this particular existence criterion. A failed rank-by-rank Jones–Wenzl recursion is not a nonexistence test; for example the characteristic-zero finite- branch includes even when an earlier recursion denominator vanished.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- R. A. Spencer, The Modular Temperley-Lieb Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ben Elias and Nicolas Libedinsky, Soergel bimodules for universal Coxeter groups, Appendix A by Ben Webster (standard reference, not scraped)