Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The join of two subobjects is their least upper bound

Statement

Let B and C be subobjects of an object A in an abelian category. Then the subobject B∨C of The join of two subobjects in an abelian category is the least upper bound of B and C in the subobject order of A.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Monomorphisms b:B↣A and c:C↣A representing the two subobjects.

[L1]

The join B∨C is the image of the induced map [b,c]:B⊕C→A (The join of two subobjects in an abelian category).

[L2]

The image of a morphism is the least subobject through which that morphism factors (The image is the least subobject through which a morphism factors).

[L3]

A subobject inequality is exactly factorization of representatives (Subobjects and quotient objects form oppositely oriented partially ordered collections).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2L3

Let j:J↣A be the image inclusion of [b,c]. Since [b,c]ιB=b and [b,c]ιC=c for the biproduct injections, the factorization of [b,c] through j makes both b and c factor through j. Thus B≤J and C≤J, so J is an upper bound of the two subobjects.

1.2L2L3construct

Let n:N↣A be any common upper bound. Then b=nu and c=nv for suitable u:B→N and v:C→N. By the universal property of B⊕C, the induced map satisfies [b,c]=n[u,v]. Now [L2] says that the image inclusion j factors through every monomorphism through which [b,c] factors, so J≤N.

2.1L3step 1.1step 1.2∎

Step 1.1 gives that J is an upper bound, and step 1.2 gives that it lies below every upper bound. By [L3], this is exactly the least-upper-bound claim.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by The join of two subobjects in an abelian category.

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources