Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The monoid-object axioms may be written without associators

Statement

Let (M,μ,η) be a monoid object in a monoidal category. Then, after the coherence identification of unbracketed tensor strings, its axioms may be written as μ∘(μ⊗1M)=μ∘(1M⊗μ), μ∘(η⊗1M)=1M,μ∘(1M⊗η)=1M, without displaying associators or unitors.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A monoid object (M,μ,η) in a monoidal category C.

[L1]

A monoid object is defined by the associativity equation μ∘(μ⊗1M)=μ∘(1M⊗μ)∘αM,M,M and the two unit equations with λM and ρM (Monoid objects and comonoid objects in a monoidal category).

[L2]

The category C is monoidally equivalent to a strict monoidal category (Mac Lane strictification).

[L3]

Unbracketed tensor strings are well defined after coherence (Unbracketed tensor strings are well defined after coherence).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2choose

Choose a strictification of C as in [L2]. Applying the strong monoidal functor of that equivalence to the diagrams from [L1] transports the monoid-object structure of M to a monoid-object structure on its image in a strict monoidal category.

2.1L2step 1.1

In the strict target, the associator and unitors are identities, so the transported axioms become exactly the displayed unbracketed equalities.

3.1L3step 2.1∎

By [L3], those unbracketed composites denote definite maps back in the original category and do not depend on which brackets were suppressed. Hence the monoid-object axioms may be written in the simplified form without changing their content.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources