Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The word category is the free monoidal category on one generator

Statement

Let W be the binary-word category and let b be an object of a monoidal category B. Recursive evaluation of binary words at b defines a strong monoidal functor Tb:WB with Tb(())=b and Tb(e0)=1B; for the unique arrow between two words of the same length, Tb uses the canonical comparison isomorphism between the corresponding parenthesised tensor powers of b. If S:WB is any other strong monoidal functor with S(())=b, then there is a unique monoidal natural isomorphism STb whose component at () is 1b.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A monoidal category B, an object bB, and the monoidal category W of binary words.

[L1]

The objects of W are binary words, and there is exactly one morphism between two words of the same length (The category of binary words).

[L2]

The category W is monoidal under binary concatenation with unit e0 (The category of binary words is monoidal).

[L3]

A strong monoidal functor is a functor equipped with invertible tensor and unit structure maps (Lax, strong, and strict monoidal functors).

[L4]

Coherence supplies a unique canonical isomorphism between any two parenthesisations of the same ordered tensor word (Mac Lane coherence in canonical-map form).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Define Tb recursively on objects by Tb(e0)=1B, Tb(())=b, and Tb(vw)=Tb(v)Tb(w). If u:vw is the unique morphism of W, then v and w have the same length, so [L4] gives a unique canonical isomorphism Tb(v)Tb(w); define Tb(u) to be that morphism. Because identities and composites in W are themselves the unique arrows between equal-length words, uniqueness in [L4] makes Tb a functor.

givenL1L4construct
2.1

The recursive object formula already matches the tensor and unit of W, and the same canonical comparison maps from [L4] provide the invertible structural maps required by [L3]. Thus Tb is a strong monoidal functor.

L2L3L4step 1.1
2.2

Let S:WB be another strong monoidal functor with S(())=b. Build isomorphisms σv:S(v)Tb(v) recursively: for e0, use the inverse of the unit map of S; for (), use 1b; and for vw, use the inverse of the binary structure isomorphism of S followed by σvσw.

L3step 1.1construct
3.1

Since every morphism in W is unique when it exists, the family σv is automatically natural, and the same recursion forces compatibility with the monoidal structure maps. Uniqueness of the recursion makes σ:STb the unique monoidal natural isomorphism fixing the generator.

L1L4step 2.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources