Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-05
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

3SAT polynomial-time many-one reduces to CLIQUE

Statement

There is a polynomial-time many-one reduction from 3-SAT to CLIQUE. Explicitly, for every 3-CNF formula φ=C1Cm one can construct in polynomial time a graph Gφ such that φ3-SAT    (Gφ,m)CLIQUE.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A 3-CNF formula φ=C1Cm,Cj=(j1j2j3).

[L1]

A polynomial-time many-one reduction is a total polynomial-time function preserving membership in both directions, by Polynomial-time many-one reductions.

[L2]

A gadget reduction is correct only after the construction cost and both directions of the witness translation are proved, by Reduction gadgets and interface invariants.

[F1]

A CLIQUE instance asks for k pairwise adjacent vertices in a finite simple graph, by Clique, independent set, and vertex cover decision problems.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Construct a graph Gφ with one vertex vjr for each literal occurrence jr in clause Cj. Join vjr and vjr by an edge exactly when jj and the literals jr and jr are not complementary. Output the CLIQUE instance (Gφ,m).

L2F1givenconstruct
2.1

Assume that φ is satisfiable, and choose a satisfying assignment. For each clause Cj, pick one literal made true by that assignment and take the corresponding vertex of Gφ. This gives m chosen vertices, one from each clause. Two chosen literals cannot be complementary because one assignment cannot make a variable and its negation both true, so step 1.1 makes every chosen pair adjacent. Therefore the chosen vertices form an m-clique.

step 1.1givenconstruct
2.2

Assume conversely that Gφ has a clique K of size m. By step 1.1, no two vertices from the same clause are adjacent, so K contains exactly one vertex from each clause. Again by step 1.1, the literals represented by those vertices are pairwise noncomplementary. Assign truth values so that every chosen literal is true, and extend arbitrarily to variables not yet assigned. Then each clause contains its chosen true literal, so φ is satisfiable.

F1step 1.1construct
2.3

The graph Gφ has 3m vertices and at most 9m2 candidate edges, so the map in step 1.1 is computable in polynomial time. Steps 2.1 and 2.2 prove φ3-SAT    (Gφ,m)CLIQUE. By [L1] and [L2], this is a polynomial-time many-one reduction.

L1L2step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources