How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A uniform-mixing CLT for square-integrable stationary sequences
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a centered strictly stationary real sequence with . If then the covariance series converges absolutely and is nonnegative. If , then for , If , Zero covariance long-run variance gives a degenerate CLT under absolute summability gives the degenerate normal limit.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the centered strictly stationary real sequence , finite second moment, and .
AC is inherited through the rho-mixing CLT. (The Axiom of Choice)
The coefficient bounds for a positive-probability past event and an event in the separated future; is the supremum of their square-integrable variable correlations. (Strong, uniform, and maximal-correlation mixing coefficients)
Real square-integrable random variables satisfy Cauchy–Schwarz. (Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables)
Simple functions are dense in real on a probability space. (Simple functions with finite-measure support are dense in for )
For a centered stationary real sequence of finite second moment, gives absolute convergence and nonnegativity of the covariance variance, and the normal CLT with that variance, including zero. (A rho-mixing CLT for square-integrable stationary sequences)
Variance and covariance are centered second and product moments. (Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space)
Proof
Fix a gap and a split , put and , and put . Take finite partitions in and in . Write , , , and . For each fixed the sum to zero. If , their positive sum is for , by [F1]. Hence ; when , every and the same bound holds. For each , gives .
For simple and , [F5] and finite Cauchy–Schwarz with weights give , using step 1.1's row and column bounds. The finite Cauchy–Schwarz inequality here is also the probability-space inequality [F2] on a finite set, after normalizing the total weight; if all weights vanish the conclusion is immediate.
For arbitrary real square-integrable -measurable and -measurable , choose simple approximants in their respective spaces using [F3]. Their means, norms and product expectations converge by [F2]; therefore step 2.1's inequality passes to the limit. Apply it to and to get . Taking the supremum over positive-variance variables and then splits in [F1] proves . No reversal of the conditioning direction of has been used.
Summation of step 3.1 gives . The given stationarity, centering, and second-moment assumptions are exactly those of [F4], so that theorem proves absolute convergence and nonnegativity of the displayed covariance series and for positive or zero . Thus every claimed conclusion holds.
Source notes
The phi-to-rho bound is proved directly by finite partitions and approximation. The normal limit is supplied by the locally proved rho-mixing CLT, rather than an external uniform-mixing limit theorem.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables
- Simple functions with finite-measure support are dense in $L^p(\mu)$ for $1 \le p < \infty$
- A rho-mixing CLT for square-integrable stationary sequences
- Strong, uniform, and maximal-correlation mixing coefficients
- Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
- Zero covariance long-run variance gives a degenerate CLT under absolute summability
Used by
- Sufficient MCMC CLT regimes Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Galin L. Jones, On the Markov Chain Central Limit Theorem, Theorem 8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Mikhail Gordin and Magda Peligrad, On the functional central limit theorem via martingale approximation, §§1–2 and §3.3; finite-partition phi-to-rho bound proved locally (standard reference, not scraped)