Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Schwarz lemma with the equality cases

Statement

Let f:D→D be holomorphic and satisfy f(0)=0. Then

∣f(z)∣≤∣z∣(z∈D),∣f′(0)∣≤1.

Moreover, if either ∣f(z0)∣=∣z0∣ for some z0∈D∖{0} or ∣f′(0)∣=1, then

f(z)=eiθz

for some real θ; conversely every rotation z↦eiθz satisfies equality in both conclusions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A holomorphic map f:D→D with f(0)=0.

[F1]

The unit disc is D={z∈C:∣z∣<1} (The unit disc, the upper half-plane, and Blaschke factors).

[F2]

If a holomorphic function on a punctured disc has a finite limit at the centre, then the singularity is removable (Characterizations of removable singularities).

[F3]

Boundary modulus control on a bounded domain bounds the modulus throughout the domain (Maximum modulus principle with boundary and infinity control).

[F4]

If the modulus of a holomorphic function has an interior local maximum, then the function is constant (Local maximum modulus principle).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1givencases

If f≡0 then the two inequalities and the equality characterization are immediate, so assume f is not identically zero and define g(z)=f(z)/z for z≠0 on the punctured disc.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

Since f′(0)=lim⁡z→0f(z)/z, the function g has finite limit f′(0) at 0; by [F2] it extends holomorphically to D, still denoted g, with g(0)=f′(0).

3.1F1F3step 2.1algebra

Fix 0<r<1. On ∣z∣=r one has ∣g(z)∣=∣f(z)∣/r≤1/r because f(D)⊆D; applying [F3] on the radius-r disc gives ∣g(z)∣≤1/r whenever ∣z∣≤r.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

For any w∈D, step 3.1 holds for every r with ∣w∣<r<1, so letting r→1− gives ∣g(w)∣≤1; therefore ∣f(w)∣=∣w∣∣g(w)∣≤∣w∣ for all w∈D, and at w=0 this also gives ∣f′(0)∣=∣g(0)∣≤1.

5.1F4step 2.1step 4.1casesalgebra

If ∣f(z0)∣=∣z0∣ for some z0≠0, then step 4.1 gives ∣g(z0)∣=1, an interior maximum for ∣g∣, so [F4] makes g constant of modulus 1; if instead ∣f′(0)∣=1, then ∣g(0)∣=1 and the same argument applies. Thus in either equality case g(z)≡eiθ for some real θ, so f(z)=eiθz on D.

6.1step 5.1algebra∎

Conversely, for f(z)=eiθz one has ∣f(z)∣=∣z∣ for all z and ∣f′(0)∣=∣eiθ∣=1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources