Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Universal affine vertex algebras exist at every complex level

Statement

Let g be a finite-dimensional complex simple Lie algebra, let B be the normalized invariant form of Untwisted affine central extension, and let k∈C. The induced module Vk(g) of Universal affine vacuum module has a unique vertex-algebra structure in the convention of Vertex algebra in the state–field convention for which 1 is the vacuum and Y(x−11,z)=Jx(z)=∑n∈Zxnz−n−1(x∈g). This construction is valid for every complex level, including values at which a normalized Sugawara denominator vanishes. It asserts no conformal vector, simple quotient, unitarity, or integrability.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite-dimensional complex simple Lie algebra, normalized invariant form, arbitrary complex level k, and the induced affine vacuum module.

[F1]

Universal affine vacuum module: Vk(g) has vacuum 1 and current modes xn.

[F2]

PBW basis of the universal affine vacuum module: ordered negative-mode monomials x−n11⋯x−nrr1 with ni≥1 span Vk(g).

[F3]

The universal affine vacuum module is restricted: every current Jx(z) is lower-truncated on each vector.

[F4]

Mode translation descends to the affine vacuum module: T1=0 and [T,xn]=−nxn−1.

[F5]

Affine current fields are local with the normalized current OPE: the current fields are creative, translation-covariant and pairwise local.

[F6]

Mutually local creative generators determine a state–field map: a creative translation-covariant local generating family whose negative modes span the space extends uniquely to a vertex-algebra state–field map.

[F7]

Vertex algebra in the state–field convention: the required state-field axioms are lower truncation, vacuum/creation, translation covariance and locality.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F5givenalgebra

Let S={Jx(z):x∈g}. By [F2], each basis monomial of Vk(g) is obtained from 1 by successively applying negative modes of fields in S; hence their negative modes span the module. By [F3] these are fields, and [F5] supplies their creation, translation covariance and pairwise locality.

2.1F2F4F5F6F7step 1.1constructalgebra

The hypotheses of [F6] now hold for Vk(g), 1, T, and S, giving a state-field map with the prescribed currents and the axioms in [F7]. For any competing structure with translation T′, [F7] gives T′1=0 and [T′,Jx(z)]=∂zJx(z), hence [T′,xn]=−nxn−1. By [F4], T′−T kills 1 and commutes with every current mode, so it vanishes on the spanning monomials of [F2]. Thus T′=T, and uniqueness for this fixed translation in [F6] proves uniqueness of the entire structure.

3.1F1F2F5step 2.1algebra∎

Every construction and verification above uses only the affine bracket, the vacuum character at level k, and formal field operations. No step divides by a function of k or assumes a grading, positivity, or a Sugawara operator. Therefore the same vertex-algebra construction applies to every k∈C, with the claimed limits on its conclusion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources