Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Verdier-duality identification intertwines Yoneda product and oriented convolution

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) as inherited from the constructible six-functor and Borel-stabilization suppliers. For the data and cornerwise maps Φ of Proper-pushforward Ext is equivariant Borel–Moore homology of the fiber product, let α:Li→Lj[r] and β:Lj→Lk[s]. With multiplication α∗β=β[r]∘α one has Φikr+s(β[r]∘α)=Φijr(α)∗Φjks(β). Here the right product is the external-product, refined middle-diagonal Thom intersection, proper-pushforward convolution of Equivariant Borel–Moore homology and oriented correspondence convolution, not a product transported by definition from Ext. The map sends id⁡Li to [ΔXi]. Consequently the direct sum of all corners is an isomorphism of unital graded algebras with this opposite-composition convention; nonmatching corners multiply to zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the Axiom of Choice; the data G,k,E,fi:Xi→E,di,Zij,Tijk,h and the maps Φ of Proper-pushforward Ext is equivariant Borel–Moore homology of the fiber product; indices i,j,k and integers r,s; morphisms α:Li→Lj[r] and β:Lj→Lk[s]. At an ordinary finite free Borel approximation (whose common dimension offset is suppressed in steps 1.1-5.1 and restored in step 6.1) put A=Zij, B=Zjk, C=Zik, T=Tijk and write the projections p:A→Xi, q:A→Xj, u:B→Xj, v:B→Xk, a:T→A, b:T→B, h:T→C, ℓ:C→Xi, m:C→Xk; they satisfy qa=ub, pa=ℓh, vb=mh, the middle square with arrows (a,b;q,u) is Cartesian, and every displayed projection is proper, being a base change of one of the proper maps fi.

[F1]

Complex-oriented diagonal Thom classes realize exceptional exchange on supports supplies the refined middle-diagonal operation, its equality with cap product by the positive complex-oriented diagonal Thom class, the exceptional-pullback exchange and its agreement with the adjunction mate of proper base change, on arbitrary closed supports and with the ordered iteration rule.

[F2]

Equivariant Borel–Moore homology and oriented correspondence convolution fixes the source-first convention, the geometric product a∗b=h∗ΔXj!(a⊠b) with its degree drop 2dj, the ordered coordinates, the zero rule for nonmatching indices and the corner degrees.

[F3]

Proper-pushforward Ext is equivariant Borel–Moore homology of the fiber product supplies the cornerwise isomorphisms Φijr through the adjunction chain Hom⁡E(fi!ki,fj!kj[t])=Hom⁡Xi(ki,fi!fj!kj[t])=Hom⁡Zij(kZ,q!kj[t]) with t=r+dj−di, their naturality in constructible coefficient morphisms, and their compatibility with stabilization.

[F4]

Constructible six functors, proper base change and normalized equivariant duality supplies, as the equivariant transport of the ordinary analytic contract of Coherent six operations on analytic constructible field sheaves, the projection formula, the dualizing proper trace, coherent base-change mates and adjunction identities, the proper base change isomorphisms b!a∗≅u∗q! and the equalities h∗=h!, fi!=fi∗ for the proper maps, and the normalized smooth orientation.

[F5]

Cartesian simplicial sheaves model actual equivariant derived Hom supplies descent and stabilization compatible with these operations on the stated bounded ranges, so one may compute at a finite approximation and pass to the stable value.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is consumed exactly through [F3], [F4] and [F5]; the typed diagram chase, the mate comparison and the shift bookkeeping below are choice-free (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF3

Typed correspondences. Put t=r+dj−di and w=s+dk−dj. Under the chain of [F3] the maps α and β correspond to kernel forms κ:kA→q!kj[t] and λ:kB→v!kk[w], equivalently to cohomological correspondences U:q!kA→kj[t] and V:v!kB→kk[w]; here kj=kXj and kk=kXk. The middle square (a,b;q,u) is Cartesian with qa=ub, and the three-factor identities pa=ℓh, vb=mh hold by construction of the triple fiber product.

2.1F4step 1.1

The explicit composite. Let BC:b!a∗→∼u∗q! be the proper base change isomorphism of [F4]. Form the map W:(vb)!kT=v!b!a∗kA→v!BCv!u∗q!kA→v!u∗Uv!kB[t]→V[t]kk[t+w]. Its adjoint kT→(vb)!kk[t+w] under (vb)!⊣(vb)! is the composite kT→a∗κa∗q!kj[t]→b!u∗kj[t]=b!kB[t]→b!λ[t](vb)!kk[t+w], in which the middle arrow is the mate exchange of BC. The equality follows by applying the adjunction (vb)!⊣(vb)! to both maps: the defining evaluation of the mate reproduces exactly the three arrows of W, so no exchange isomorphism beyond BC is assumed.

3.1F1F2F3step 2.1

Geometric interpretation of the mate. Put S=A×B, F=(q,u):S→Xj×Xj, and θ:T↪S. By [F1] the pulled-back positive purity counit is gF:θ∗kT[−2dj]→kS. The external dualizing class corresponding to κ⊠λ has degree n+n′, where n=di+dj−r and n′=dj+dk−s by [F3]; composing it with gF and taking the adjoint under θ∗⊣θ! gives a class of degree n+n′−2dj on T. The graph-factorization and composition-of-counits comparison proved in [F1] identifies this supported cap map with the mate in step 2.1, followed by b!λ[t]. Thus its representative is exactly the adjoint of W. The purity counit, its pullback, and the mate are fixed global morphisms; the positive normal-ball generator fixes their orientation, while their equality on arbitrary supports follows from that supported adjunction comparison.

4.1F2F4step 2.1step 3.1

Pushing the correspondence to the third corner. Its adjoint representative is UC:m!kC→m!ηhm!h∗kT=(vb)!kT→Wkk[t+w], where ηh:kC→h∗h∗kC=h∗kT is the ordinary adjunction unit and h∗=h! by [F4]. In kernel form this is kC→h∗kT→h∗h!m!kk[t+w]→ϵhm!kk[t+w] with ϵh the dualizing proper trace, and dualizing transitivity identifies the middle dualizing object with ωT[−2dk+t+w]. Step 3.1 therefore identifies the class on C represented by UC with h∗ΔXj!(Φijr(α)⊠Φjks(β)), which by [F2] is the convolution product Φijr(α)∗Φjks(β).

5.1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1step 4.1

The composition square commutes. The inverse of the chain of [F3] sends U to fi!ki→fi!ηpfi!p∗kA=fj!q!kA→fj!Ufj!kj[t] and V to the analogous map built from u,v, where ηp:ki→p∗p∗ki=p∗kA is the adjunction unit and fj!=fj∗. In the composite of these two maps, naturality of ηu:id⁡→u∗u∗ moves fj!U past the second unit, and proper base change u∗q!≅b!a∗ identifies the resulting two units with the unit ηpa:ki→(pa)∗kT; the Beck–Chevalley unit identity is the transpose of the triangle equations under fi!⊣fi! and (vb)!⊣(vb)!, so both routes give the same morphism fi!ki→fi!ηpafk!(vb)!kT→fk!Wfk!kk[t+w]. Applying the inverse map to UC gives the same expression, because pa=ℓh and the composed-unit formula ηℓh=ℓ∗ηhℓ∗∘ηℓ follows from the same triangle equations. Hence the product square commutes for arbitrary cohomological correspondences, before orientation or grading is applied; this is the compatibility of products asserted in the Statement.

6.1F1F2F5step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1

Shifts, degrees and signs. Restore the object shifts: t+w=r+s+dk−di. The corner degrees di+dj−r and dj+dk−s add and lose 2dj under the refined intersection, giving di+dk−r−s, which is the corner degree of the output. At a finite approximation the middle factor has dimension dj+b and each incoming ordinary Borel–Moore degree acquires 2b, so the output acquires exactly 2b and the stable equivariant degree is unchanged. Homogeneous maps compose as V[t]∘U, hence as β[r]∘α after restoring shifts, with no interchanged factors and no additional sign; the only possible sign in re-ordering the complex normal factors is (−1)(2dj)(2dj)=+1, and external products follow the usual tensor Koszul convention with no permutation occurring here.

7.1A1F2F3F4step 3.1step 5.1step 6.1∎

Units and the algebra statement. Let δ:Xi→Zii be the diagonal, with pδ=qδ=id⁡Xi. The cohomological correspondence for its fundamental class is Uδ:q!kZii→q!δ∗kXi=kXi, induced by restriction kZii→δ∗kXi. Its inverse image under the chain [F3] is fi!kXi→fi!p∗kZii→fi!kXi; restriction of the first unit to δ is the identity, so this composite is the identity. The adjoint kernel of Uδ is the proper trace of the positive fundamental class of Xi, since δ!q!kXi=kXi. Hence Φii0(id⁡Li)=δ∗[Xi]=[ΔXi], of corner degree zero. Step 5.1 transfers associativity and these units from shifted composition; the unit on the finite sum is ∑i[ΔXi]. The cornerwise bijections of [F3] therefore give the claimed unital graded algebra isomorphism, with nonmatching corners zero by [F2]. AC is inherited through [A1].

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Equivariant Borel–Moore homology and oriented correspondence convolution.

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources