Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The topology of W2 is narrow convergence plus uniform second-moment tails

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For d≥1, a sequence (μn)n≥1 in P2(Rd) indexed by positive integers, and μ∈P2(Rd), W2(μn,μ)→0 if and only if μn converges narrowly to μ and lim⁡R→∞sup⁡n≥1∫{∣x∣>R}∣x∣2dμn(x)=0. Tightness by itself is insufficient: for e1=(1,0,…,0) and μn=(1−n−2)δ0+n−2δne1, the sequence is tight and converges narrowly to δ0, but W2(μn,δ0)=1 for every n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, d≥1, a sequence (μn)n≥1 indexed by positive integers, and a probability μ, all with finite second moments.

[F1]

Under AC, each pair has an optimal coupling, and W2 is the metric defined by the infimum of the quadratic coupling cost. The Euclidean quadratic Wasserstein space Optimal quadratic couplings exist and their cost is weakly lower semicontinuous The Axiom of Choice

[F2]

Narrow convergence means convergence of integrals of every bounded continuous function; the portmanteau theorem gives convergence on every Borel set whose boundary has limit measure zero. Weak convergence of borel probability measures Portmanteau theorem

[F3]

Finite Borel measures have product measures; for probability residuals, the product has those residuals as marginals. The product measure of two sigma-finite measure spaces For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique

Proof

1.1givenF1F2

Suppose W2(μn,μ)→0. For each n choose an optimal coupling πn and regard its coordinates as Xn,Y with laws μn,μ. The cost gives ∫∣Xn−Y∣2dπn→0. For bounded continuous φ, choose a ball B(0,K) with μ(B(0,K)c) small. On the event ∣Y∣≤K and ∣Xn−Y∣≤δ<1, both points lie in the compact ball B‾(0,K+1), where φ is uniformly continuous. The complement has probability at most μ(B(0,K)c)+δ−2∫∣Xn−Y∣2dπn. First choose K, then δ, and then n; the boundedness of φ shows ∫φdμn−∫φdμ→0. Thus μn⇒μ.

1.2givenF2

Conversely suppose narrow convergence and the stated uniform tail condition. Fix ε>0. Choose R so that the second-moment tails outside Q=[−R,R]d of all μn and of μ are less than ε; the tail of μ vanishes because μ∈P2. Enlarge R slightly if necessary so its coordinate faces have zero μ-mass. Partition each coordinate interval [−R,R] by finitely many levels that are not atoms of the corresponding one-dimensional marginal of μ, with mesh small enough that each resulting rectangular cell has diameter at most ε. Such levels exist because each probability has at most countably many atoms. Together with Qc, these cells form a finite Borel partition (Ci)i=0N whose boundaries have μ-measure zero. By [F2], an,i:=μn(Ci)→ai:=μ(Ci) for each i.

2.1givenF1step 1.1

Write Zn=Xn−Y and an=∫∣Zn∣2dπn→0. For R>K, on {∣Xn∣>R} either ∣Y∣>K or ∣Zn∣>R−K. Since ∣Xn∣2≤2∣Y∣2+2∣Zn∣2, for every n, ∫∣Xn∣>R∣Xn∣2dπn≤2∫∣Y∣>K∣Y∣2dπn+2K2an(R−K)2+2an. Given a target η>0, first choose K so the first term is below η/4; then choose N so an<η/8 for n≥N; then choose R>K so the middle term is below η/8 for all n≥N. The last term is below η/4. Finally enlarge R so the finitely many tails for n<N are below η. This proves the required uniform tail limit.

2.2F2F3step 1.2

For each bounded cell Ci⊂Q, match mass rn,i=min⁡(an,i,ai). If rn,i>0, take rn,i times the product of the probability measures μn∣Ci/an,i and μ∣Ci/ai; if rn,i=0, use the zero measure. This gives a coupling piece supported on Ci×Ci with cost at most ε2rn,i. Subtract its two marginals from μn and μ. The residual measures have equal mass. If that mass is positive, their normalized product, multiplied by that mass, couples them; if it is zero there is no residual piece. The sum is a coupling πn of μn,μ. Its matched cost is at most ε2. For the residual coupling, ∣x−y∣2≤2∣x∣2+2∣y∣2. Its residual second moments are bounded by the two tails outside Q plus dR2∑i=1N∣an,i−ai∣ on each side: inside a bounded cell, unmatched mass is exactly the positive part of the difference of its two cell masses. Therefore W2(μn,μ)2≤∫∣x−y∣2dπn≤ε2+4ε+4dR2∑i=1N∣an,i−ai∣. For this fixed finite partition the sum tends to zero, so lim sup⁡nW2(μn,μ)2≤ε2+4ε. Letting ε↓0 proves W2(μn,μ)→0.

3.1F1F2step 1.2∎

For the witness, the mass outside a ball of radius R is at most n−2 for indices n>R and is zero for indices n≤R; hence the family is tight. For bounded continuous φ, ∫φdμn=(1−n−2)φ(0)+n−2φ(ne1)→φ(0), proving narrow convergence. Every coupling with second marginal δ0 is concentrated on Rd×{0}, so its cost is forced to be ∫∣x∣2dμn=1. The asserted failure of W2 convergence follows.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources