How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Whitney's inequalities: for every nontrivial connected graph
Statement
For every connected finite simple graph with at least two vertices,
This includes complete graphs under the convention : for with , all three quantities equal .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A connected finite simple graph with at least two vertices.
for every nontrivial connected graph (For every nontrivial connected graph, ).
for every nontrivial connected graph (For every nontrivial connected graph, ).
Proof
Applying [L1] and [L2] to gives .
For , deleting fewer than vertices leaves a nonempty complete graph and deleting leaves one vertex, so ; every vertex has degree , and deleting all edges incident with one vertex is an edge cut, while any smaller edge deletion leaves every pair joined through a remaining direct edge or a two-edge path. Hence , as stated.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 15 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Wolfram MathWorld, Vertex Connectivity (standard reference, not scraped)