Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Wiener's lemma for absolutely convergent Fourier series

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. If fA(T) and its continuous representative has f(x)0 for every xT, then 1/fA(T).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and a nowhere-zero fA(T).

[L1]

A(T) is a unital commutative Banach algebra (The Wiener algebra is a unital commutative Banach algebra).

[L2]

Every 1(Z) coefficient sequence has a continuous uniform synthesis with exactly those Fourier coefficients (Absolutely summable Fourier coefficients give uniform convergence).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let χ be a character of A(T) and put z=χ(e1). Since enen=1 and e±nA=1, boundedness applied for every n1 gives znχ and znχ, hence z=1. By [L2], every fA(T) is the A-norm limit of its finite Fourier sums, so continuity gives χ(f)=kZf^(k)zk. Thus the characters of A(T) are exactly evaluations at points of T.

L1L2algebra
2.1

The standard maximal-ideal/Gelfand--Mazur criterion for a unital commutative complex Banach algebra says that an element is invertible exactly when no character vanishes on it: under the Axiom of Choice a nonunit lies in a maximal ideal, whose quotient character vanishes there; conversely a vanishing character rules out a multiplicative inverse. Applying this criterion and step 1.1, f is a unit exactly when it has no zero on T.

L1step 1.1givenalgebra
3.1

The hypothesis makes f a unit, so its algebra inverse is the pointwise reciprocal 1/f.

step 2.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources