Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Worpitzky's identity for n≥1

Statement

For every n,m∈N with n≥1,

mn=∑k=0n−1A(n,k)(m+kn).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Naturals n and m.

[L1]

The Eulerian numbers satisfy A(n,k)=(k+1)A(n−1,k)+(n−k)A(n−1,k−1) (The Eulerian numbers satisfy A(n,k)=(k+1)A(n−1,k)+(n−k)A(n−1,k−1)).

[L3]

A(1,0)=1 by the definition of Eulerian numbers (Eulerian numbers and Eulerian polynomials).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1baseL3given

For n=1, [L3] makes the right-hand side (m1)=m=m1.

1.2ih

Assume the identity at n−1, where n≥2, and write Wn(m):=∑k=0n−1A(n,k)(m+kn).

2.1step 1.2L1algebra

Using [L1] and shifting the second sum, Wn(m)=∑k=0n−2A(n−1,k)((k+1)(m+kn)+(n−k−1)(m+k+1n)).

3.1step 2.1L2algebra

Fix k from step 2.1 and put M:=m+k. If n>M+1, then [L2] gives (Mn)=(M+1n)=(Mn−1)=0, so the bracket in step 2.1 is 0=m(Mn−1). If n=M+1, then (Mn)=0, (M+1n)=1, and (Mn−1)=1, so the same bracket is (n−k−1)=m=m(Mn−1). Finally, if n≤M, then Pascal's rule from [L2] gives (n−k−1)(M+1n)=(n−k−1)(Mn)+(n−k−1)(Mn−1), and the closed-form identity from [L2] gives n(Mn)=(M+1−n)(Mn−1)=(m+k+1−n)(Mn−1). Substituting into the bracket of step 2.1 yields m(Mn−1). So in every case that bracket simplifies to m(m+kn−1).

4.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1

Steps 2.1 and 3.1 give Wn(m)=m∑k=0n−2A(n−1,k)(m+kn−1), and the inductive hypothesis of step 1.2 makes this m⋅mn−1=mn.

5.1step 4.1discharge-induction∎

This is the required identity.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources