How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Zeta bounds in classical zero free region
Statement
There are and such that for and , In the narrower region, . For and , with removable interpretations at one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data and hypotheses of the statement.
Zeta horizontal logarithmic derivative comparison: There are absolute , with , such that for and ,
Riemann zeta classical zero free region: There is an absolute such that has no zeros in . The pole at is not a zero.
The Riemann zeta function has its Euler product on the half-plane : For every with , where the product ranges over the primes and converges absolutely and locally uniformly on .
For , zeta admits the fractional-part integral formula with a simple residue-one pole at : For every complex number with and , where is the fractional part. The integral defines a holomorphic function on , so the right-hand side is meromorphic there with a single simple pole at of residue .
Proof
Choose smaller than the constant in the horizontal comparison. This gives the stated derivative bound throughout the high-height region.
At , , the Euler logarithm satisfies , by comparing the positive real zeta series to its integral. Integrate from horizontally to for . The length is and the integrand is , so the change in the continued logarithm is . Exponentiating its negative real part gives . For larger sigma the Euler logarithm already gives that bound.
On the compact low-height portion choose sufficiently small that is holomorphic and nonvanishing on a neighborhood, including . Then and are bounded there. The identities and prove both low-height estimates and their removable interpretations.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Theorem 6.7, pp.174–175 (standard reference, not scraped)