Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Zeta bounds in classical zero free region

Statement

There are 0<c2<c1<c0 and C>0 such that for t3 and σ1c1/log(t+2), ζ/ζ(σ+it)Clog(t+2)Clog2(t+2). In the narrower c2 region, 1/ζ(s)Clog(t+2). For t3 and 1c2/log(t+2)σ2, ζ/ζ(s)+1/(s1)=O(1),1/ζ(s)=O(s1), with removable interpretations at one.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The data and hypotheses of the statement.

[F1]

Zeta horizontal logarithmic derivative comparison: There are absolute d>0,C>0, with d<c0, such that for t3 and σ1d/log(t+2), ζ(σ+it)ζ(σ+it)Clog(t+2).

[F2]

Riemann zeta classical zero free region: There is an absolute c0>0 such that ζ has no zeros in σ1c0/log(t+2). The pole at s=1 is not a zero.

[F3]

The Riemann zeta function has its Euler product on the half-plane Res>1: For every sC with Res>1, ζ(s)=p11ps, where the product ranges over the primes and converges absolutely and locally uniformly on Res>1.

[F4]

For Res>0, zeta admits the fractional-part integral formula with a simple residue-one pole at 1: For every complex number s with Res>0 and s1, ζ(s)=ss1s1{x}xs1dx, where {x}=xx is the fractional part. The integral defines a holomorphic function on Res>0, so the right-hand side is meromorphic there with a single simple pole at s=1 of residue 1.

Proof

1.1

Choose c1 smaller than the constant in the horizontal comparison. This gives the stated derivative bound throughout the high-height region.

F1
2.1

At s1=1+1/L+it, L=log(t+2), the Euler logarithm satisfies logζ(s1)logζ(1+1/L)log(1+L), by comparing the positive real zeta series to its integral. Integrate ζ/ζ from s1 horizontally to s for 1c2/Lσ1+1/L. The length is O(1/L) and the integrand is O(L), so the change in the continued logarithm is O(1). Exponentiating its negative real part gives 1/ζ(s)=O(L). For larger sigma the Euler logarithm already gives that bound.

F3step 1.1
3.1

On the compact low-height portion choose c2<c1 sufficiently small that h(s)=(s1)ζ(s) is holomorphic and nonvanishing on a neighborhood, including h(1)=1. Then h/h and 1/h are bounded there. The identities ζ/ζ+1/(s1)=h/h and 1/ζ=(s1)/h prove both low-height estimates and their removable interpretations.

F2F4

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources