Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Zeta bounds in classical zero free region

Statement

Assume countable choice.

There are 0<c2<c1<c0 and C>0 such that for ∣t∣≥3 and σ≥1−c1/log⁡(∣t∣+2), ∣ζ′/ζ(σ+it)∣≤Clog⁡(∣t∣+2)≤Clog⁡2(∣t∣+2). In the narrower c2 region, ∣1/ζ(s)∣≤Clog⁡(∣t∣+2). For ∣t∣≤3 and 1−c2/log⁡(∣t∣+2)≤σ≤2, ζ′/ζ(s)+1/(s−1)=O(1),1/ζ(s)=O(∣s−1∣), with removable interpretations at one.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice and the data and hypotheses of the statement.

[F1]

Zeta horizontal logarithmic derivative comparison: There are absolute d>0,C>0, with d<c0, such that for ∣t∣≥3 and σ≥1−d/log⁡(∣t∣+2), ∣ζ′(σ+it)ζ(σ+it)∣≤Clog⁡(∣t∣+2).

[F2]

Riemann zeta classical zero free region: There is an absolute c0>0 such that ζ has no zeros in σ≥1−c0/log⁡(∣t∣+2). The pole at s=1 is not a zero.

[F3]

The Riemann zeta function has its Euler product on the half-plane Re⁡s>1: For every s∈C with Re⁡s>1, ζ(s)=∏p11−p−s, where the product ranges over the primes and converges absolutely and locally uniformly on Re⁡s>1.

[F4]

For Re⁡s>0, zeta admits the fractional-part integral formula with a simple residue-one pole at 1: For every complex number s with Re⁡s>0 and s≠1, ζ(s)=ss−1−s∫1∞{x}x−s−1 dx, where {x}=x−⌊x⌋ is the fractional part. The integral defines a holomorphic function on Re⁡s>0, so the right-hand side is meromorphic there with a single simple pole at s=1 of residue 1.

Proof

1.1F1

Under countable choice, choose c1 smaller than the constant in the horizontal comparison. This gives the stated derivative bound throughout the high-height region.

2.1F3step 1.1

At s1=1+1/L+it, L=log⁡(∣t∣+2), the Euler logarithm satisfies ∣log⁡ζ(s1)∣≤log⁡ζ(1+1/L)≤log⁡(1+L), by comparing the positive real zeta series to its integral. Integrate ζ′/ζ from s1 horizontally to s for 1−c2/L≤σ≤1+1/L. The length is O(1/L) and the integrand is O(L), so the change in the continued logarithm is O(1). Exponentiating its negative real part gives ∣1/ζ(s)∣=O(L). For larger sigma the Euler logarithm already gives that bound.

3.1F2F4∎

On the compact low-height portion choose c2<c1 sufficiently small that h(s)=(s−1)ζ(s) is holomorphic and nonvanishing on a neighborhood, including h(1)=1. Then h′/h and 1/h are bounded there. The identities ζ′/ζ+1/(s−1)=h′/h and 1/ζ=(s−1)/h prove both low-height estimates and their removable interpretations.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources