Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-04
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Riemann zeta function has its Euler product on the half-plane Re⁡s>1

Statement

For every s∈C with Re⁡s>1,

ζ(s)=∏p11−p−s,

where the product ranges over the primes and converges absolutely and locally uniformly on Re⁡s>1.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L2algebra

Write σ:=Re⁡s. Since the primes are among the integers at least 2, ∑p∣p−s∣=∑pp−σ≤∑n=2∞n−σ<∞ by [L1]. For every prime p, ∣p−s∣=p−σ<1, so 1−p−s≠0. Therefore [L2] applies to ap:=−p−s and makes the product ∏p(1−p−s) convergent and nonzero.

1.2L3L4algebra

For a finite set P of primes, ∏p∈P11−p−s=∏p∈P∑k≥0p−ks. Multiplying out this finite product lists exactly the terms n−s for those integers n≥1 whose prime divisors all lie in P, and [L3] with [L4] shows that each such integer appears exactly once. Hence ∏p∈P11−p−s=∑n≥1p∣n⇒p∈Pn−s.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2L1algebra

Let PN be the set of primes at most N. By step 1.2 the corresponding partial products are the partial sums over integers all of whose prime divisors lie in PN. Every fixed integer eventually has this property, and the omitted terms are bounded in absolute value by the tail of the absolutely convergent series in [L1]. Therefore these partial products converge pointwise to ∑n≥1n−s=ζ(s).

3.1step 2.1L1choosealgebra∎

Let K⊆{s:Re⁡s>1} be compact, and choose σ>1 with Re⁡s≥σ on K. If an integer n is omitted from the partial product over PN, then n has some prime divisor greater than N, hence n>N. So for s∈K, ∣ζ(s)−∏p≤N11−p−s∣≤∑n>Nn−σ. The tail on the right tends to 0 independently of s, so the partial products converge uniformly on K. Thus the Euler product converges locally uniformly on Re⁡s>1. Combining this with steps 1.1 and 2.1 proves the stated formula together with its absolute and locally uniform convergence.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources