Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Riemann zeta function has no zeros on the closed half-plane Re⁡s≥1, except for its pole at 1

Statement

The meromorphic continuation of ζ has no zeros on the closed half-plane Re⁡s≥1. Its only singularity there is the simple pole at s=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real number t.

[L1]

Zeta has no zeros on Re⁡s>1 (The Riemann zeta function has no zeros when Re⁡s>1).

[L2]

On Re⁡s>0, zeta is meromorphic with only a simple pole at 1 (For Re⁡s>0, zeta admits the fractional-part integral formula with a simple residue-one pole at 1).

[L3]

On Re⁡s>1, the Euler product for zeta converges absolutely and locally uniformly (The Riemann zeta function has its Euler product on the half-plane Re⁡s>1).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2givenchoosealgebra

By [L1], only the boundary line Re⁡s=1 remains to be checked. Suppose t≠0 and ζ(1+it)=0. Since [L2] makes zeta holomorphic at 1+it, there are δ>0 and C>0 such that ∣ζ(σ+it)∣≤C(σ−1)(1<σ<1+δ).

2.1step 1.1L2L3algebra

For σ>1 and real u, absolute convergence in [L3] and the power series −log⁡(1−z)=∑m≥1zm/m give log⁡∣ζ(σ+iu)∣=∑p∑m≥1cos⁡(mulog⁡p)mpmσ. Consequently log⁡ ⁣∣ζ(σ)3ζ(σ+it)4ζ(σ+2it)∣=∑p∑m≥13+4cos⁡(mtlog⁡p)+cos⁡(2mtlog⁡p)mpmσ≥0, because 3+4cos⁡θ+cos⁡2θ=2(1+cos⁡θ)2≥0. Exponentiating gives ∣ζ(σ)3ζ(σ+it)4ζ(σ+2it)∣≥1. On the other hand, [L2] gives ζ(σ)=1/(σ−1)+O(1) as σ↓1, so ζ(σ)3=O((σ−1)−3). The point 1+2it is not 1, so [L2] also makes ζ(σ+2it) bounded as σ↓1. Combining these bounds with step 1.1 yields ∣ζ(σ)3ζ(σ+it)4ζ(σ+2it)∣=O(σ−1)→0, contradicting the lower bound above.

3.1step 2.1L1L2algebra∎

Therefore ζ(1+it)≠0 for every t≠0. At t=0, [L2] says s=1 is a simple pole, not a zero. Together with [L1], this proves that zeta has no zeros on Re⁡s≥1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources