How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The only zeros of zeta on the nonpositive real axis are the negative even integers, and every other zero lies in the open critical strip
Statement
For each integer ,
These are the only zeros of on the nonpositive real axis. Every other zero of satisfies . Moreover, if is a nontrivial zero, then so are and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The classical functional equation.
Zeta has no zeros on (The Riemann zeta function has no zeros on the closed half-plane , except for its pole at ).
Gamma extends meromorphically to with poles only at the nonpositive integers (Meromorphic continuation of Gamma).
Gamma has no zeros (Gamma has no zeros).
On , zeta is given by the Dirichlet series (The Riemann zeta function on the half-plane ).
Proof
Let . Substituting into [L1], the sine factor vanishes, is finite by [L3], and by [L2]. Hence .
For real and not a negative even integer, the sine factor in [L1] is nonzero. Also , so [L2] gives , and [L3] with [L4] gives . Therefore [L1] forces . To handle , let in [L1]: one has , , and zeta has a simple residue-one pole at , so . Thus . Hence the only nonpositive real zeros are the numbers .
Now let be any zero of zeta that is not one of the negative even integers. If , then [L2] gives because , and [L4] gives unless is a nonpositive integer, which cannot happen when . Since the sine factor in [L1] vanishes only at even integers, step 2.1 rules out that possibility. Therefore [L1] cannot vanish at , a contradiction. So every zero not listed in step 1.1 satisfies . Applying [L2] again excludes , so every remaining zero lies in .
If is a nontrivial zero, then step 3.1 places it in the open critical strip. The sine and Gamma factors in [L1] are therefore finite and nonzero, so the functional equation gives . On , the Dirichlet series in [L5] satisfies term by term. Meromorphic continuation therefore extends this identity to all , so implies .
Depends on
- The Riemann zeta function satisfies the classical sine-gamma functional equation
- The Riemann zeta function has no zeros on the closed half-plane $\operatorname{Re}s\ge1$, except for its pole at $1$
- Meromorphic continuation of Gamma
- Gamma has no zeros
- The Riemann zeta function on the half-plane $\operatorname{Re}s>1$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Elias M. Stein and Rami Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Ch. 6 §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Chandrasekharan, Lectures on the Riemann Zeta-Function, Lecture 13 §8 (standard reference, not scraped)