How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Well-balanced balance laws and wet/dry fronts — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
2 · Summary
Examples
The finite calculations verify a rest lake with a dry crest, a first HLL step that wets a neighboring dry cell while preserving water, and a concrete central-flux/centered-source update that creates a spurious momentum from a discrete lake. The counterexample distinguishes exact well-balancedness of the specified hydrostatic reconstruction from any general claim about centered source approximations.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
A centered pressure flux and centered bed source move a discrete lake
Statement refuted
On a periodic three-cell grid, the central physical-flux rule with centered bed source preserves every lake-at-rest state under the update
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The periodic central-flux/centered-source update in the refuted statement, , any , bed values , and states , . These are admissible lake-at-rest data with level under One-dimensional shallow-water balance law with a dry-state convention. Show one updated momentum is nonzero.
One-dimensional shallow-water balance law with a dry-state convention: for a wet rest state, , , and the momentum flux is .
Counterexample
The pressure values are , , and by [F1]. Thus the central right and left momentum fluxes at cell are and .
The central-flux contribution to is . The centered source contributes . Therefore , so the stated update moves this lake and the universal preservation claim is false.
A lake at rest over a bump with a dry crest
Example
Take five periodic cells, , bed values , and free-surface level . Set and , so ; the crest cell is dry.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The periodic five-cell bed and states above. Verify the exact one-step hydrostatic HLL update.
One-dimensional shallow-water balance law with a dry-state convention: on wet rest cells, and ; a dry cell has with .
Hydrostatic reconstruction with a dry-safe HLL flux and one-sided pressure corrections: each side corrected flux is the common HLL flux plus its cell pressure minus reconstructed pressure.
The hydrostatic HLL update preserves lakes at rest, including dry cells: if the reconstructed states at a face agree at rest, the cell-side corrections leave equal hydrostatic pressures on the two faces of each cell.
Verification
The data are admissible by [F1]. The four face maxima, including the periodic face between cells and , are , so the paired reconstructed depths are respectively , , , , and . All reconstructed velocities are zero.
At these equal states the common HLL fluxes are , , , and . Adding the one-sided pressure corrections in [F2] makes the two corrected fluxes adjacent to each cell both equal : the five cell pressures are .
Each cell therefore has zero corrected-flux difference in the update, so every state is unchanged, including the dry crest. This verifies the exact lake-at-rest preservation in [F3] for this finite wet/dry example.
A first HLL step wets a dry cell without negative depth
Example
On the full-line unit grid, set , , for , and for . Use for one hydrostatic HLL step.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The step data and time step above. Compute the wet/dry interface fluxes, verify the cellwise CFL and update the two cells adjacent to the initial front.
Hydrostatic reconstruction with a dry-safe HLL flux and one-sided pressure corrections: with flat bed the hydrostatic states equal the cell states; the HLL flux uses the specified wave-speed extrema and the finite-volume flux-difference update.
The hydrostatic HLL step conserves water and preserves dry admissibility: on a finite chain with admissible ghost states, including a single updated cell, the face-specific CFL preserves admissible depth and dry momentum.
Verification
At every wet/wet face the states agree at , the speeds are , and the HLL flux is . At every dry/dry face the speeds and flux are zero. At the unique wet/dry face, , , and , so the middle formula in [F1] gives .
For a wet cell adjacent to the front the outgoing-speed sum is , so times that sum is ; for the first dry cell it is , so the product is ; all other cells have either the wet/wet value or the dry/dry value on each side, and satisfy the same bound. For each , apply [F2] to the single-cell chain consisting of cell , with its actual initial neighbors as ghost states and their bed values zero. Its two face fluxes and update coincide with those on the full-line grid by [F1]. Thus every updated cell is admissible.
The wet cell has left flux and right flux , hence . The dry cell has left flux and right flux , hence . Both depths are positive, and their sum remains , so the front wets the adjacent dry cell without losing water.
Sources
- E. Audusse, F. Bouchut, M.-O. Bristeau, R. Klein, and B. Perthame, A Fast and Stable Well-Balanced Scheme with Hydrostatic Reconstruction for Shallow Water Flows
- F. Bouchut, III. Shallow water problem – Hydrostatic reconstruction scheme
- D. I. Ketcheson, R. J. LeVeque, and M. J. del Razo, Riemann Problems and Jupyter Solutions, Chapter 12