Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 3 results · all verified · 2 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Well-balanced balance laws and wet/dry fronts — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Examples

The finite calculations verify a rest lake with a dry crest, a first HLL step that wets a neighboring dry cell while preserving water, and a concrete central-flux/centered-source update that creates a spurious momentum from a discrete lake. The counterexample distinguishes exact well-balancedness of the specified hydrostatic reconstruction from any general claim about centered source approximations.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

A centered pressure flux and centered bed source move a discrete lake

Statement refuted

On a periodic three-cell grid, the central physical-flux rule F^i+1/2=(F(Ui)+F(Ui+1))/2 with centered bed source (0,−ghi(bi+1−bi−1)/(2Δx)) preserves every lake-at-rest state under the update Ui+=Ui−ΔtΔx(F^i+1/2−F^i−1/2)+Δt(0,−ghi(bi+1−bi−1)2Δx).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The periodic central-flux/centered-source update in the refuted statement, Δx=g=1, any Δt>0, bed values (b0,b1,b2)=(0,1/2,0), and states mi=0, hi=1−bi=(1,1/2,1). These are admissible lake-at-rest data with level η0=1 under One-dimensional shallow-water balance law with a dry-state convention. Show one updated momentum is nonzero.

[F1]

One-dimensional shallow-water balance law with a dry-state convention: for a wet rest state, mi=0, hi+bi=η0, and the momentum flux is ghi2/2.

Counterexample

1.1givenF1algebra

The pressure values are p0=1/2, p1=1/8, and p2=1/2 by [F1]. Thus the central right and left momentum fluxes at cell 0 are F^1/2m=(p0+p1)/2=5/16 and F^−1/2m=(p2+p0)/2=1/2.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra∎

The central-flux contribution to m0+ is −Δt(5/16−1/2)=3Δt/16. The centered source contributes −Δt h0(b1−b2)/2=−Δt/4=−4Δt/16. Therefore m0+=−Δt/16≠0, so the stated update moves this lake and the universal preservation claim is false.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

A lake at rest over a bump with a dry crest

Example

Take five periodic cells, g=1, bed values (b0,b1,b2,b3,b4)=(0,1,2,1,0), and free-surface level η0=2. Set mi=0 and hi=(2−bi)+, so (hi)=(2,1,0,1,2); the crest cell is dry.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The periodic five-cell bed and states above. Verify the exact one-step hydrostatic HLL update.

[F1]

One-dimensional shallow-water balance law with a dry-state convention: on wet rest cells, mi=0 and hi+bi=η0; a dry cell has (hi,mi)=(0,0) with bi≥η0.

[F2]

Hydrostatic reconstruction with a dry-safe HLL flux and one-sided pressure corrections: each side corrected flux is the common HLL flux plus its cell pressure minus reconstructed pressure.

[F3]

The hydrostatic HLL update preserves lakes at rest, including dry cells: if the reconstructed states at a face agree at rest, the cell-side corrections leave equal hydrostatic pressures on the two faces of each cell.

Verification

1.1givenF1F2algebra

The data are admissible by [F1]. The four face maxima, including the periodic face between cells 4 and 0, are (1,2,2,1,0), so the paired reconstructed depths are respectively (1,1), (0,0), (0,0), (1,1), and (2,2). All reconstructed velocities are zero.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

At these equal states the common HLL fluxes are (0,1/2), (0,0), (0,0), (0,1/2) and (0,2). Adding the one-sided pressure corrections in [F2] makes the two corrected fluxes adjacent to each cell both equal (0,hi2/2): the five cell pressures are 2,1/2,0,1/2,2.

3.1F2F3step 2.1algebra∎

Each cell therefore has zero corrected-flux difference in the update, so every state is unchanged, including the dry crest. This verifies the exact lake-at-rest preservation in [F3] for this finite wet/dry example.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

A first HLL step wets a dry cell without negative depth

Example

On the full-line unit grid, set g=1, bi=0, Ui0=(1,0) for i≤0, and Ui0=(0,0) for i≥1. Use λ=Δt/Δx=1/2 for one hydrostatic HLL step.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The step data and time step above. Compute the wet/dry interface fluxes, verify the cellwise CFL and update the two cells adjacent to the initial front.

[F1]

Hydrostatic reconstruction with a dry-safe HLL flux and one-sided pressure corrections: with flat bed the hydrostatic states equal the cell states; the HLL flux uses the specified wave-speed extrema and the finite-volume flux-difference update.

[F2]

The hydrostatic HLL step conserves water and preserves dry admissibility: on a finite chain with admissible ghost states, including a single updated cell, the face-specific CFL λ(aR at right−aL at left)≤1 preserves admissible depth and dry momentum.

Verification

1.1F1givenalgebra

At every wet/wet face the states agree at (1,0), the speeds are (−1,1), and the HLL flux is (0,1/2). At every dry/dry face the speeds and flux are zero. At the unique wet/dry face, FL=(0,1/2), FR=(0,0), UR−UL=(−1,0) and aLaR=−1, so the middle formula in [F1] gives F^=(1/2,1/4).

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

For a wet cell adjacent to the front the outgoing-speed sum is 1+1=2, so λ times that sum is 1; for the first dry cell it is 1+0=1, so the product is 1/2; all other cells have either the wet/wet value 1 or the dry/dry value 0 on each side, and satisfy the same bound. For each i, apply [F2] to the single-cell chain consisting of cell i, with its actual initial neighbors Ui−10,Ui+10∈K as ghost states and their bed values zero. Its two face fluxes and update coincide with those on the full-line grid by [F1]. Thus every updated cell is admissible.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The wet cell i=0 has left flux (0,1/2) and right flux (1/2,1/4), hence U01=(1,0)−12((1/2,1/4)−(0,1/2))=(3/4,1/8). The dry cell i=1 has left flux (1/2,1/4) and right flux (0,0), hence U11=(0,0)−12((0,0)−(1/2,1/4))=(1/4,1/8). Both depths are positive, and their sum remains 1, so the front wets the adjacent dry cell without losing water.

Sources