Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two oscillators are recurrent but nonergodic on their total shell

Statement refuted

Every Hamiltonian time map on every compact regular finite-measure energy shell is ergodic for its normalized shell measure.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume full AC for the regular-shell measure supplier. Choose m1,m2,ω1,ω2>0 and a total energy E>0.

[A1]

Full AC is the exact assumption in Invariant energy-weighted and regular-shell probabilities for its regular-shell clause (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Hamiltonian phase, complete-domain flow and reference measure: on M=R4 use ω=dq1∧dp1+dq2∧dp2 and the Hamiltonian flow convention ιXHω=dH.

[F2]

Invariant energy-weighted and regular-shell probabilities: under full AC, the stated regular compact positive-energy shell has a finite positive invariant probability measure.

[F3]

Hamiltonian recurrence under the exact finite-measure hypothesis: every fixed sampled map preserving a finite shell measure has almost-everywhere recurrence on each measurable subset.

[F4]

Ergodicity and mixing for a selected probability map: ergodicity requires every strictly invariant measurable set S, with ΦΔ−1S=S, to have probability zero or one.

Counterexample

Given: [A1], the parameters above, and [F1]–[F3].

1.1A1F1F2givenalgebra

Define H(q,p)=∑i=12(pi2/(2mi)+miωi2qi2/2) on R4. The Hamilton equations are q˙i=pi/mi and p˙i=−miωi2qi, whose explicit oscillatory solutions exist for every real time. For J=(0,∞), ∇H vanishes only at the origin and hence nowhere on H−1(J). For every compact K⊂J, H−1(K) is closed and bounded because H is a positive-definite quadratic form, hence compact in R4. The level ΣE=H−1({E}) is therefore a nonempty compact regular shell with the exact hypotheses of [F2].

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Let E1(q1,p1)=p12/(2m1)+m1ω12q12/2 and put S={z∈ΣE:E1(z)<E/2}. The equations in step 1.1 conserve E1 because ddtE1=(p1/m1)(−m1ω12q1)+(m1ω12q1)(p1/m1)=0. Hence every time map satisfies ΦΔ−1S=S. The set S is a nonempty relatively open subset of ΣE; for instance points with (q1,p1)=(0,0) lie in it. Its complement contains a nonempty relatively open subset with E1>E/2. The regular-shell graph density ∣∇H∣−1dA is positive on every graph chart, so both open subsets have positive shell measure. Since the whole shell measure is finite and positive by [F2], the normalized probability of S lies strictly between zero and one.

3.1A1F2F3F4step 2.1∎

The invariant measurable set S has intermediate probability, so [F4] rules out ergodicity of ΦΔ for every Δ>0. By [F2], the normalized shell law is a finite invariant probability; apply [F3] to that same law and sampled map to obtain almost-everywhere recurrence. This is a recurrent Hamiltonian system that is not ergodic, refuting the statement.

Remarks

The two oscillator energies are conserved separately. Compactness and Liouville preservation therefore do not imply that a time map explores its entire energy shell.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources