How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A spacelike hypersurface of a globally hyperbolic model that is not a Cauchy hypersurface
Statement refuted
Statement refuted: "every spacelike embedded hypersurface of a globally hyperbolic time-oriented smooth Lorentzian four-manifold is a Cauchy set" (Spacelike hypersurfaces, acausal sets, Cauchy sets, domains of dependence and Cauchy horizons clauses (a) and (c), Chronology, causality, strong causality, global hyperbolicity and time functions clause (c)).
Facts & Assumptions
Assume Countable Choice and Dependent Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (), The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain) for the general absolutely continuous causal-curve conclusions used here.
Given: The flat model of The flat model: Minkowski space R^4, its standard Lorentz form, inertial charts and cone sets, written , with its global inertial chart , the open unit ball and the set and the point with .
The flat model is globally hyperbolic and its level sets are Cauchy hypersurfaces (The flat model is globally hyperbolic and its inertial level sets are Cauchy hypersurfaces clauses (b), (d)).
Along an inextendible future causal curve of the coordinate is a strictly increasing surjection onto (Monotonicity of inertial time and the Lipschitz graph property for causal curves in the flat model clause (c)).
On the open neighborhood of , the smooth chart has and , so is an embedded submanifold; its tangent space is with positive definite metric restriction (Embedded submanifolds and slice charts, Spacelike hypersurfaces, acausal sets, Cauchy sets, domains of dependence and Cauchy horizons clause (a)).
A Cauchy set meets every inextendible causal curve in exactly one parameter value (Spacelike hypersurfaces, acausal sets, Cauchy sets, domains of dependence and Cauchy horizons clause (c)).
Counterexample
(The set is spacelike.) By [L3] the set is an embedded three-dimensional submanifold of with tangent space spanned by , on which is positive definite; hence is a spacelike embedded hypersurface.
(An inextendible causal curve missing it.) Define , . This is a smooth curve with constant tangent , which satisfies and is future-directed by clause (c) of The flat model: Minkowski space R^4, its standard Lorentz form, inertial charts and cone sets, so is a future timelike (hence causal) curve; its -coordinate is the identity of , so it has no point limit at either infinite parameter end: such a limit would force its continuous real time coordinate to have a finite limit. Thus is inextendible by Causal curves, chronological and causal reachability, and inextendibility clause (d). But and with , so for every ; the parameter set is empty and in particular not a singleton.
(Conclusion.) By step 1.2 there is an inextendible causal curve that meets in no parameter value; by [L4] the set is not a Cauchy set, and by step 1.1 it is a spacelike embedded hypersurface, so it is not a Cauchy hypersurface. Since the ambient model is globally hyperbolic by [L1], this refutes the displayed statement: in a globally hyperbolic model a spacelike hypersurface need not be Cauchy.
Remarks
- Why Cauchy leaves are special. The full inertial level sets are Cauchy because is a strictly increasing surjection onto on every inextendible future causal curve ([L2]); being an entire level set of a temporal function alone does not imply the Cauchy property. The fragment is achronal and spacelike, but inextendible causal curves outside the spatial ball never see it.
- Scope. The example is purely kinematic; no field equation, matter content or measurement enters.
Depends on
The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain
The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Spacelike hypersurfaces, acausal sets, Cauchy sets, domains of dependence and Cauchy horizons
Chronology, causality, strong causality, global hyperbolicity and time functions
Causal curves, chronological and causal reachability, and inextendibility
The flat model: Minkowski space R^4, its standard Lorentz form, inertial charts and cone sets
Embedded submanifolds and slice charts
The flat model is globally hyperbolic and its inertial level sets are Cauchy hypersurfaces
Monotonicity of inertial time and the Lipschitz graph property for causal curves in the flat model
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- E. Minguzzi, Lorentzian causality theory, Living Reviews in Relativity 22 (2019), article 3: domains of dependence, Cauchy horizons and Cauchy hypersurfaces, sections 3.1-3.3 printed pp. 83-103; Definition 3.14 printed p. 87; Definition 3.35 printed p. 95
- E. Gourgoulhon, 3+1 Formalism and Bases of Numerical Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/0703035 (2007): a Cauchy surface is met once and only once by every causal curve without endpoint, section 3.2.1 printed p. 39