How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A conserved finite current obstructs an integrable dc correlation
Statement refuted
Every finite thermal lattice current correlation defined by the current convention in this page is absolutely integrable on , so its unregulated Green–Kubo integral is finite.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The finite-volume current convention, finite Mazur bound, and three-site ring below.
Continuity equation for a local lattice charge current: local charge-conserving bond terms give the oriented continuity equation and self-adjoint bond currents.
Conserved overlaps bound the finite persistent current correlation: a centered finite current with nonzero overlap with a conserved operator has a strictly positive lower bound on its Cesàro autocorrelation.
Take , with orthonormal site basis , indices modulo , with a fixed of unit , and for an energy . Use finite and .
Counterexample
Given: [A1], [F1]–[F3]. Let be the cyclic shift, , , and .
Each acts only on the span of , so it commutes with every outside those two sites and with . The definition [F1] therefore applies. By [F2], each bond current is self-adjoint, so . Direct multiplication gives and . Since is unitary, commutes with ; hence , and .
In the Fourier basis of the three-cycle, has eigenvalues , while has eigenvalues in the corresponding order. The two states with energy have equal Gibbs weight, so . Positive definiteness of and give , with unit .
Because , Heisenberg evolution fixes for all . Thus and is a positive constant. Therefore , refuting the statement.
In the finite Mazur bound [F3], choose the single conserved operator . Then , so the lower bound on the Cesàro average of the unnormalized autocorrelation is . The per-site convention in the definition gives , so the Mazur contribution for the Cesàro average of is , equal to the constant correlation found in step 3.1. This remains a finite-volume obstruction only; no thermodynamic Drude weight is inferred.
Diagram
The arrows show the orientation used in [F1]. The diagram records the three-site ring in [A1]; the proof computes its matrices directly and does not use the picture.