How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The central binomial coefficient is asymptotic to 4^n divided by the square root of pi n
Statement
For , put . Then
Equivalently,
where the asymptotic notation means that the ratio of the two sides tends to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A natural and the positive real .
For , , so the usual factorial quotient equals the binomial coefficient ( for ; hence , the quotient is a natural number, and , The set of -element subsets and the binomial coefficient , The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in ).
For , , with , and (Wallis's product: pi over two is the limit of the finite Wallis products).
A finite product in a monoid has empty product equal to the identity and satisfies the recursion that adjoins its last factor (The product of a finite list in a monoid, by recursion, with the empty product () equal to the identity).
Products and quotients of convergent real sequences have the corresponding limits when the limiting denominator is nonzero (Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients).
Every nonnegative real has a unique nonnegative square root (Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are ).
For every there is a natural with (For every in a complete ordered field there is a natural with ).
The constant is positive (Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine).
Proof
By [L1] and [L3],
Comparing step 1.1 with the factors in gives
By [L2], [L4], and step 2.1, . Also by [L6], so
Let , which is defined by [L5] and [L7]. Then by step 3.1, and so .
For every , the ratio of to is exactly . Thus either displayed asymptotic formulation implies the other, by the definition of asymptotic equivalence.
At , but the comparison term is undefined. The theorem starts at , where every denominator in steps 1.1 to 5.1 is positive, and steps 4.1 and 5.1 prove its two equivalent formulations.
Depends on
Wallis's product: pi over two is the limit of the finite Wallis products
for ; hence , the quotient is a natural number, and
The set of -element subsets and the binomial coefficient
The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in
Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are
Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients
For every in a complete ordered field there is a natural with
The product of a finite list in a monoid, by recursion, with the empty product () equal to the identity
Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine