How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
for ; hence , the quotient is a natural number, and
Statement
Let with . Then, in ,
and consequently:
- (The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in );
- integrality: in , , so the familiar quotient is the canonical natural of a natural number, namely of the count ;
- symmetry: .
Here is the canonical natural of The canonical natural of a field and the truncated difference, which for is the ordinary one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Naturals with ; the initial segment , which satisfies ; and for the set of bijections .
for every finite with ; is finite (The set of -element subsets and the binomial coefficient ).
when , and such a set is finite (A finite set with has exactly bijections onto itself, and bijections onto any set of the same cardinality).
The product rule (The product rule: , and ).
Factorials (The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in ): for every ; for .
Cardinality and subsets (The cardinality of a finite set, A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if ): transport along a bijection; ; a subset of a finite set is finite.
Arithmetic of : multiplication is associative and commutative, and with gives (Multiplication is associative, Multiplication is commutative, Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor); determines (Order on the natural numbers, Addition is cancellative).
The embedding is multiplicative and injective, and for (clauses 0 and 7 of Laws of finite sums and products in , and , The canonical natural of a field); a nonzero element of a field has a unique inverse, so division by it is legitimate (Identities and inverses in a field are unique, Field).
Maps (Injection, surjection, bijection, Equinumerous sets, and ): a map with a two-sided inverse is a bijection; a bijection of carries a subset onto a subset and the complement onto the complement.
Proof
The set to be counted twice is , of cardinality by [L2]. For put . These sets are pairwise disjoint, since determines , and their union over is all of , because is a subset of of cardinality for every bijection of .
For any with one has : the sets and are disjoint with union , so by [L3], and [L7] identifies the second summand as .
for every . Indeed maps to : if then restricted to is a bijection onto , and, being a bijection of , it carries onto . The map is a two-sided inverse, the union of the two functions being a function on and a bijection onto . Since and by step 1.2, [L2] and [L4] give the cardinality .
Symmetry. The map sends into by step 1.2, and sends into , again by step 1.2 together with , which holds because . The two are mutually inverse, since for . Hence .
Counting by the blocks of step 1.1 and using [L3], , the summand being constant.
Clause 1. By [L5], , so by step 3.1 and associativity; since , cancellation gives .
Clause 2. Applying to step 3.1 and using multiplicativity, . Both and are nonzero by [L5] and [L8], so their product is invertible in and . The left-hand side is the canonical natural of the count , which is what the word integrality means here.
The displayed identity is step 3.1, clause 1 is step 4.1, clause 2 is step 4.2 and clause 3 is step 2.2.
Remarks
-
Why the symmetry is proved by a bijection. Complementation is shorter than manipulating the closed formula, it needs no hypothesis beyond , and it is the argument that survives to the multinomial coefficient, where no single closed formula is available until the analogous count has been made.
-
Where is used. In step 1.1, so that is a subset of of cardinality and is nonempty; and in step 1.2, so that is a genuine difference. For both sides of the displayed identity are still defined, but the left-hand side is while is not, so the hypothesis is not removable.
-
The quotient formula is a theorem about a natural number. A reader who starts from has to prove that the division comes out exact. Starting from the count, the exactness is what step 3.1 says, and the quotient is a consequence.
Depends on
The set of -element subsets and the binomial coefficient
A finite set with has exactly bijections onto itself, and bijections onto any set of the same cardinality
The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in
The sum rule: a finite disjoint union is finite with and , and a sum over a finite index set splits along a partition
The product rule: , and
The sum over a finite index set, and its product form
The cardinality of a finite set
A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if
Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor
Multiplication is associative
Multiplication is commutative
Laws of finite sums and products in , and
The canonical natural of a field
Identities and inverses in a field are unique
Field
Order on the natural numbers
Addition is cancellative
Injection, surjection, bijection
Equinumerous sets, and