How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
If is Noetherian then is Noetherian for every
Statement
Let be a Noetherian commutative ring. Then the iterated polynomial ring of Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration is Noetherian for every .
The index starts at , where the published definition sets and the assertion is the hypothesis itself.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A Noetherian commutative ring .
Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates are defined recursively by and (Polynomial rings in finitely many commuting indeterminates by iteration).
If is a Noetherian commutative ring then is a Noetherian commutative ring (Hilbert basis theorem: if is Noetherian then is Noetherian).
Proof
At the recursive definition gives , which is Noetherian by hypothesis; this is the base of the induction and is not skipped.
Let and assume is Noetherian.
The recursive definition gives , a polynomial ring in one indeterminate over the ring assumed Noetherian in step 1.2; the Hilbert basis theorem applied to that ring makes Noetherian.
The base case of step 1.1 and the passage of step 2.1 give, by induction on , that is Noetherian for every .
Remarks
-
Finitely many indeterminates is essential. The induction produces a proof for each separately and says nothing about a ring of polynomials in infinitely many indeterminates; the companion examples page carries a witness that the conclusion fails there.
-
The converse holds too, by iterating is Noetherian if and only if is Noetherian down the tower of coefficient rings.