How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, generators modulo an ideal in the Jacobson radical lift to generators
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice.
Let be a commutative ring, let satisfy , and let be a finitely generated left -module. If elements generate , then generate .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), a commutative ring , an ideal with , a finitely generated left -module , and elements whose images generate .
Under AC, if a finite module satisfies and , then (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, Nakayama's lemma); applying this supplier in step 2.1 is the sole inherited use of AC here.
The submodule consists of finite sums of products with and (The submodule generated by products of elements of an ideal with elements of a module ).
A finite list of elements generates the submodule it spans (Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module).
Proof
Let be the submodule of generated by . The hypothesis on means every element of is congruent modulo to an element of , so .
Passing to the quotient , step 1.1 gives . Since is a quotient of the finite module , it is finite, so [L1] gives .
The equality means , so generate .