How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The support is the union of the closures of the associated primes
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a Noetherian commutative ring and let be a finitely generated left -module. Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a Noetherian commutative ring , and a finitely generated left -module .
Under AC, minimal primes in the support of are associated primes of (Minimal support primes of a finite module are associated).
For a finitely generated module, (For a finite module, support is the set of primes containing the annihilator).
Under AC, the module admits a prime filtration, and support is the union of the supports of its prime-filtration quotients (Finite modules over Noetherian rings admit prime filtrations, Support in a short exact sequence is the union of the outer supports, The support of a cyclic quotient is its vanishing set).
Every associated prime lies in the support (Associated primes lie in the support).
Proof
Under the stated AC, [L3] gives for the prime ideals occurring in a prime filtration of . Let . Then for some . Choose such an index with minimal under inclusion among the filtration primes contained in . If and , then [L3] gives some , so the minimal choice of forces and hence . Therefore is minimal in the support, so [L1] gives and . This proves .
Conversely, let and let . By [L4], the prime lies in the support; then [L2] gives , so . Thus for every .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove the support decomposition.
Depends on
Minimal support primes of a finite module are associated
For a finite module, support is the set of primes containing the annihilator
Finite modules over Noetherian rings admit prime filtrations
Support in a short exact sequence is the union of the outer supports
The support of a cyclic quotient is its vanishing set
Associated primes lie in the support
The Axiom of Choice