Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedverified 2026-11-05 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Restricted contragredient of a generalized VOA module

Definition

Let U be a conformal vertex algebra of CFT type and let M=⨁h∈CM[h] be a grading-restricted generalized left U-module. Its restricted contragredient vector space is M′=⨁h∈CM[h]∗, where each algebraic functional is supported on one finite-dimensional generalized weight space and every element of the direct sum has finite support in h. The conformal vector defines operators LM(n) on M. The proposed contragredient action is determined, for homogeneous u∈U and λ∈M′, by ⟨YM′(u,z)λ,m⟩=⟨λ, YM ⁣(ezL(1)(−z−2)L(0)u,z−1)m⟩,m∈M. For homogeneous u of integer weight d, (−z−2)L(0)u=(−1)dz−2du. The formal exponential ezL(1)u is finite on each homogeneous u because positive Virasoro modes lower its nonnegative weight. For the component variant fix a positive integer k and k commuting left V-module actions on M, with conformal operators Lj(n). For λ=(λ1,…,λk)∈Ck define M[λ]={m∈M:for each j, (Lj(0)−λjI)Njm=0 for some integer Nj≥1}. Assume M=⨁λ∈CkM[λ], each joint space is finite dimensional, and there are real numbers bj such that M[λ]≠0 implies Re⁡λj≥bj. This is an algebraic direct sum, so every vector has finite joint-weight support. Set M′=⨁λ∈CkM[λ]∗, pairing each summand with its matching joint space and with zero on the others. Define each candidate component action by the same opposite-field pairing formula, using the jth action on M and the state operators of V. No decomposition of M as a tensor product is required. This definition specifies the candidate action; its module axioms and grading-restrictedness are asserted only by the separate theorem item.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources