Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Locally finite counting measures and vague topology

Definition

Fix d≥1. Let B(Rd) be the σ-algebra generated by the Euclidean open sets, and understand all measures below as defined on (Rd,B(Rd)). A measure here is a countably additive map from B(Rd) to [0,∞] that assigns 0 to the empty set. A locally finite counting measure on Rd is a measure of the form ξ=∑r∈Iδxr, where I is finite or countable, repetitions among the points xr∈Rd are allowed, and every compact set contains only finitely many listed points, counting repetitions. The empty sum is allowed and is the zero measure. For a Borel set B, ξ(B) is the number of listed points in B, with multiplicity. Write Γlf(Rd) for the set of these measures. For x∈Rd, the point mass δx assigns mass 1 to a Borel set containing x and mass 0 otherwise.

For any continuous compactly supported f:Rd→R and ξ=∑r∈Iδxr, define ∫f dξ:=∑r:xr∈supp⁡ff(xr), where supp⁡f is the closure of {x:f(x)≠0}. This sum is finite by local finiteness, counts multiplicities, and is independent of the listing because ξ fixes the multiplicity at every point. For the zero measure it is 0.

The vague topology on Γlf(Rd) is the coarsest topology for which ξ↦∫f dξ is continuous for every nonnegative continuous compactly supported function f:Rd→R. Thus ξn→vξ exactly when ∫f dξn→∫f dξ for every such f.

Given a probability space (Θ,A,P), meaning that A is a σ-algebra on Θ and P is a countably additive probability measure on A with P(Θ)=1, a random locally finite counting measure is an (A,Bv)-measurable map Ξ:Θ→Γlf(Rd), where Bv:=σ{U:U is open in the vague topology just defined}. We require that, for every bounded Borel set B⊆Rd, the evaluation Ξ(B):Θ→[0,∞) given by Ξ(B)(θ)=Ξ(θ)(B) is A-measurable; it is finite by local finiteness. Write EP for integration with respect to P. A sequence (Ξn) of such measures on a common probability space uses this same domain and target for every n. If K is compact, its local counts are uniformly integrable on K when

lim⁡R→∞sup⁡nEP ⁣[Ξn(K)1{Ξn(K)>R}]=0.

This is the count-tail condition used when an argument needs control of unbounded observables supported in K. The definition asserts no convergence of expectations without the exact test-function, support, and tail hypotheses of the result being applied.

Remarks

This measure-space topology is distinct from finite-spin product topology and cylinder convergence. Vague convergence tests compactly supported spatial functions and can lose mass at infinity; weak convergence of probability measures cannot be inferred from it without an additional tightness condition.

Dependency tree · 0 levels

Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.

Sources