Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Polarization, magnetization, bound and free sources, and the fields D and H

Physical scope

The macroscopic polarization P and magnetization M as dipole-moment densities of the chosen material model, the derived bound charge and bound current densities, the free/bound source decomposition, and the displacement D and magnetic intensity H, in SI units on the laboratory region in a fixed inertial frame. Definitions and conventions only: no field equation, no constitutive law, no conservation statement and no microscopic identification.

Definition

Let the laboratory region U≅I×Ω, its frame basis (e1,e2,e3), its units, its fields E,B and its source densities ρ,J be those of Laboratory geometry: a restricted inertial chart, its spatial slices and fixed-time fields, Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values, The electric and magnetic fields as fixed-time spatial vector fields and Charge parameter, frame charge and current densities, volume charge and flux, and the four-current, and let the averaging convention be that of Declared averaging kernel, macroscopic scale assumptions and averaged fields, in whose sense the objects below are macroscopic. Any convolution used to instantiate that reading is taken on its declared exact interior-footprint domain, or under a declared locally integrable compatible extension covering every used footprint. Its every-time use requires every-time locally integrable spatial slices; joint spacetime local integrability alone supplies only the almost-every-time branch. The joint C2 regularity specified below is a separate model hypothesis, not a consequence of spatial smoothing.

(a) [Dipole moments, polarization and magnetization] Fix the following moment convention in the frame basis. For a supplied closed rectangular box K⊂R3, a reference position r0∈R3, a continuous charge density f:R3→R supported in the interior of K, and a stationary current density g:R3→R3 of class C1 supported in the interior of K with div⁡g=0, define the electric and magnetic dipole moments about r0 by

p[f;r0]:=∫K(y−r0)f(y) dy,m[g;r0]:=12∫K(y−r0)×g(y) dy.

Here f carries C m−3, g carries A m−2, p carries C m and m carries A m2; the cross product is that of The cross product in R3. Integrals are componentwise Riemann integrals of The Riemann integral of a bounded function over a bounded Jordan measurable set, finite by A continuous real function on a compact Jordan measurable set is Riemann integrable over that set. These specify the normalization of source moments, with r0 retained as part of the data; they impose no microscopic representation on the material below.

The material model specifies two maps P,M:Ω×I→R3 of class C2 in the sense of Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms. To say that they are electric and magnetic dipole-moment densities means that, for every compact Jordan-measurable volume V⊂Ω and t∈I, the model assigns the material moment contents

P(V,t):=∫VP(y,t) dy,M(V,t):=∫VM(y,t) dy,

in C m and A m2, respectively, using the same finite componentwise integrals. Thus P carries C m−2 and M carries A m−1. These contents record the model's assigned material moments; they are not defined by applying the source-moment formulas to the total or bound sources restricted to V. Matching them to microscopic charge/current moments requires an additional material identification, not supplied here. The maps are data of the chosen material model, and no relation between (P,M) and E,B is asserted here.

(b) [Bound sources] Write div⁡ and curl⁡ for the divergence and curl of Divergence and curl of a C1 vector field taken at fixed t, and ∂t for the partial derivative of Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn at fixed position, and define the bound charge density and bound current density by

ρb:=−div⁡P,Jb:=∂tP+curl⁡M.

Since P,M are jointly C2, ρb and Jb are continuous, indeed C1, by the componentwise sum and product rules of Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)′(c)=f′(c)+g′(c), (αf)′(c)=αf′(c), (fg)′(c)=f′(c)g(c)+f(c)g′(c), and (f/g)′(c)=(f′(c)g(c)−f(c)g′(c))/g(c)2 when g(c)≠0; ρb carries C m−3 and Jb carries A m−2.

(c) [Free sources] Define ρf:=ρ−ρb and Jf:=J−Jb, in the same units as ρ and J; these are the free charge and free current densities of the model. The decomposition ρ=ρf+ρb, J=Jf+Jb is part of the chosen material model: the same total pair (ρ,J) with a different pair (P,M) is a different model.

(d) [Displacement and magnetic intensity] Define the electric displacement and the magnetic intensity by

D:=ε0E+P,H:=μ0−1B−M,

where ε0=(μ0c2)−1 and μ0,c>0 are the constants of Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values; D carries C m−2 and H carries A m−1.

(e) [Status] This item fixes objects and the bound/free convention only. No field equation (the item pthm-em-macroscopic-maxwell), no constitutive relation (the item post-em-material-closure), no conservation of the bound pair (the item pthm-em-macroscopic-maxwell, clause (a)) and no identification of P,M with microscopic dipole sums is asserted here.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources