Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Crepant resolution and matter surface

Definition

Let B be a smooth integral complex algebraic threefold and let L→B be an algebraic line bundle. Let p:W→B be the weighted projective bundle of L⊗2⊕L⊗3⊕OB with coordinate weights (2,3,1). In local trivializations the coordinate twists are x∈OW(2)⊗p∗L⊗2, y∈OW(3)⊗p∗L⊗3, and z∈OW(1). Let YW⊆W be the integral hypersurface y2=x3+fxz4+gz6, where f and g are algebraic sections of L⊗4 and L⊗6, respectively, and set πW=p∣YW. Let W∘⊆W be its smooth open containing YW. Write i:YW↪W∘ for the hypersurface inclusion and M=OW(6)⊗p∗L⊗6∣W∘ for the line bundle of its defining section. The integral fourfold hypersurface is the zero subscheme of a nonzero section of M, hence an effective Cartier divisor in the smooth W∘. Define its dualizing (canonical) sheaf by the local complete-intersection Ext formula ωYW:=ExtOW∘1 ⁣(i∗OYW,det⁡ΩW∘/C1), regarded as an OYW-module via the closed immersion i. The Cartier resolution 0→M−1→OW∘→i∗OYW→0 computes this as the invertible line i∗(det⁡ΩW∘/C1⊗M). For a smooth complex algebraic fourfold Y^, set ωY^=det⁡ΩY^/C1.

A crepant resolution of YW is specified data ρ:Y^⟶YW where Y^ is a smooth integral complex algebraic fourfold, ρ is proper (separated, of finite type, and universally closed) and birational (it maps the generic point to the generic point and induces an isomorphism of function fields), and ωY^≅ρ∗ωYW as line bundles. In this carrier, “crepant” means exactly this canonical-line isomorphism. Set π^:=πW∘ρ. For b∈B, a geometric fiber means base change along Spec⁡κ(b)‾→B. A resolution chamber is the specified resolution data (ρ,C), where C is a specified collection of irreducible curve components in geometric fibers of π^, including the chosen components used to form matter surfaces below. Matter surfaces attached to different resolution chambers are separate data. This definition does not assert that a resolution exists, is unique, projective, or flat over B.

If T⊆B is an integral closed subvariety with generic point ηT, its geometric generic fiber is the scheme Y^ηˉT:=Y^×BSpec⁡κ(ηT)‾, where κ(ηT)‾ is an algebraic closure of the residue field at ηT. Its fiber configuration means the isomorphism class of this scheme. A codimension-two fiber-change locus relative to a specified integral closed divisor D⊂B is a specified collection of irreducible reduced closed curves Σ⊂D such that dim⁡CΣ=1 (hence codim⁡BΣ=2) and the geometric generic fibers over ηΣ and ηD are nonisomorphic as schemes after base change along any chosen pair of C-embeddings of their residue-field algebraic closures into a common algebraically closed field. A matter curve is one such specified ΣR; D is typically a chosen discriminant component.

A selected fibral curve family is a specified closed reduced irreducible surface SR↪Y^ with π^(SR)⊆ΣR such that the restriction qR:SR→ΣR is proper (separated, of finite type, and universally closed) and flat (each OSR,s is a flat OΣR,qR(s)-module), every geometric fiber is nonempty and pure of dimension one, and its geometric generic fiber is isomorphic to P1 and is one of the chosen components in C. The surface SR is the matter surface for that resolution chamber. Its complex dimension is two; its associated integral algebraic 2-cycle [SR] is the coefficient-one generator of the free abelian group on irreducible two-dimensional closed subvarieties of Y^. The definition provides no identification between data attached to distinct choices.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth complex algebraic threefold B, its algebraic Weierstrass fourfold πW:YW→B, the smooth ambient open W∘, and, when a matter surface is considered, a chosen resolution ρ, a specified divisor D, a matter curve ΣR⊂D, and one selected curve family.

[F1]

The Weierstrass model is the algebraic hypersurface over the line-bundle data of Weierstrass model over a line bundle. Its defining section lies in the line bundle M named in the Definition, and the model lies in the smooth ambient open W∘. The weighted-projective bundle is integral over the integral base, and the defining section has nonzero y2 and x3 terms; hence its local equations are nonzerodivisors in the regular ambient local domains. Thus i is Cartier and its resolution 0→M−1→OW∘→i∗OYW→0 is exact.

[F2]

The proper, birational, and flat map terms have the exact scheme-theoretic meanings stated in the Definition, matching Proper morphisms, Birational morphisms of integral finite-type schemes, and Flat morphism of schemes. The canonical line on YW and the canonical line on Y^ are the ones explicitly defined in the Definition.

[F3]

A matter curve includes the specified divisor D and the nonisomorphism comparison of geometric generic fibers in the Statement. A matter surface is a reduced irreducible algebraic surface by the selected data; its integral algebraic cycle is the coefficient-one formal generator attached to that irreducible subvariety. Compactness is not needed to define this algebraic cycle.

[F4]

Flatness and the one-dimensional geometric fibers are hypotheses on the chosen map qR; no theorem supplies a resolution, a matter curve, a rational fibral component, or a flat family in this definition.

Proof

technique · verify the canonical-line comparison is well typed and verify the dimension and cycle of the specified matter surface
1.1F1F2givenalgebra

By [F1], the Cartier resolution is exact. Applying HomOW∘(−,det⁡ΩW∘/C1) computes Ext1 as the cokernel of multiplication by the defining section, namely i∗i∗(det⁡ΩW∘/C1⊗M). Thus the defined dualizing sheaf is invertible. The determinant of differentials on the smooth fourfold Y^ is also a line bundle, so ωY^≅ρ∗ωYW is a well-typed isomorphism of line bundles. Properness and birationality are separate required properties of ρ and are not consequences of that isomorphism.

2.1F3F4givenalgebra∎

The selected SR is an irreducible reduced closed surface by its stated data. Thus [SR] is the coefficient-one generator of the cycle group on its irreducible two-dimensional subvariety, a complex two-cycle (real dimension four). Proper flatness and the stated fiber conditions are hypotheses, not existence conclusions.

Commutative diagram

SRbY§RBqRb¼

The square commutes because qR is the restriction of π^ to SR; it records the surface family and base curve used in the definition.

Remarks

The matter surface is a geometric cycle in a chosen resolution. It is not, by definition, a representation, a gauge algebra, a chiral index, or evidence that a crepant resolution exists.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources