Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Unforced periodic Leray–Hopf solution

Definition

Let d≥2, L>0, ν>0, u0∈H, and use the spaces and weak-time conventions of Periodic solenoidal Fourier spaces and Weak time continuity and energy spaces. A global unforced periodic Leray–Hopf solution with data (ν,u0) is a map u:[0,∞)→H such that its restriction to each finite interval is in Cw([0,T];H) and its Bochner equivalence classes satisfy u∈L∞(0,∞;H)∩Lloc2(0,∞;V). All clauses involving u(t) at a specified time, including the initial trace and energy inequalities, refer to this weakly continuous map. By the uniqueness result in Weak time continuity and energy spaces, it is the unique weakly continuous representative of those Bochner classes. It must satisfy u(0)=u0 in H, ∥u(t)−u0∥H→0 as t↓0, and for every smooth real periodic divergence-free test field ϕ:[0,∞)×TLd→Rd compactly supported in time, ∫0∞ ⁣[(u,∂tϕ)+(u⊗u,∇ϕ)−ν(∇u,∇ϕ)]dt+(u0,ϕ(0))=0. It must also satisfy, for every t≥0, ∥u(t)∥22+2ν∫0t∥∇u(s)∥22ds≤∥u0∥22, and there must be a full-measure set S⊂(0,∞) such that for every s∈S∪{0} and every t≥s, ∥u(t)∥22+2ν∫st∥∇u(τ)∥22dτ≤∥u(s)∥22. For a matrix field A, (div⁡A)i=∑j∂jAij. The tensor pairing means (u⊗u):∇ϕ=∑i,juiuj∂jϕi; the gradient pairing means ∇u:∇ϕ=∑i,j∂jui∂jϕi. All derivatives in the weak identity are distributional; the definition asserts neither uniqueness nor smoothness.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The parameters and spaces in the Definition, with the distributional derivative convention of Distributional derivative.

[F1]

Weak time continuity and energy spaces: Cw consists of actual maps with continuous fixed H pairings; Bochner memberships are almost-everywhere equivalence classes, and a weakly continuous representative is unique when it exists.

[F2]

Distributional derivative: distributional derivatives are defined by transferring derivatives to compactly supported smooth tests with the sign ⟨∂tu,ϕ⟩=−⟨u,∂tϕ⟩.

[F3]

Periodic solenoidal Fourier spaces: H is the real solenoidal subspace of normalized L2(TLd), V=H∩H1, and its weak gradients have coefficients iκk,ju^(k). Spatial pairings and norms in the Definition use dμ=L−ddx.

Proof

1.1givenF1F3

The Lt∞H and Lloc2V clauses and the weak identity depend only on the Bochner equivalence classes; the tensor term is integrable because u∈Lt∞Lx2, and the gradient term is integrable by u∈Lloc2V. The requirement u∈Cw selects an actual map, unique within its almost-everywhere class by [F1]. The initial value, strong initial trace, and energy inequalities are predicates on that representative, not on an arbitrary representative of the Bochner class.

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1∎

The sign and initial term in that identity agree with the distributional derivative convention in [F2]; the all-time energy clause and the almost-everywhere restart clause are additional explicit requirements, and neither implies a smoothness or uniqueness clause. Thus the definition is unambiguous under the stated conventions.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources