How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Stationary weak-field data: the diagonal ansatz, its bounds, stationarity and the Einstein-family condition
Definition
Let be the flat model of The flat model spacetime: the Minkowski metric on R^4 and its inertial chart with inertial chart and constant components . Let be a nonempty open spacetime region, identified with its image in , and let be the spatial projection . Its image is open: a coordinate ball in about any point projects onto a ball about that point's spatial coordinates. Let be compact. Let and be the constants of the framework's conventions and put . The coordinates have units of metres, has units , and is dimensionless.
(a) Structural data. A tuple is stationary weak-field data when
- is a length, is dimensionless, and is dimensionless;
- is a smooth dimensionless spatial function and is a family of smooth dimensionless spatial functions for some ( and smooth maps between smooth manifolds);
- for every the component field
is the component field of a smooth Lorentzian metric on of signature (Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model);
- (spatial factorization and stationarity) all metric components factor through by construction. Thus points of with the same spatial coordinates have the same metric components, even when they lie in different connected components of that spatial fiber, and on ;
- (spatial bounds) for every multiindex with and every ,
(Derivatives are with respect to ; here is the maximum over and is the maximum over .)
(b) Derived data. For stationary weak-field data define the spatial potential
a smooth spatial function of dimension in the framework's unit conventions; its pullback to is stationary. The symmetric component family is the perturbation of the family.
(c) Einstein families. Stationary weak-field data form an Einstein family with coupling when for every there is a smooth symmetric component field on (Smooth covariant 2-tensor fields on a smooth manifold) satisfying
where the connection of is the unique torsion-free, metric-compatible connection supplied for any smooth nondegenerate metric by Existence and uniqueness of the metric-selected connection of a nondegenerate metric, and its extension to tensor fields clauses (a)-(b), with that supplier's convention. Its Einstein tensor is defined without assuming a global time orientation as follows. For each , fix a timelike and extend its inertial-chart components constantly. By continuity of , this smooth field remains timelike on an open neighborhood . Apply The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors clauses (a)-(c) to , using the restricted connection, which is the metric-selected connection there by uniqueness. In particular, , , and
where is the inverse metric matrix. These local tensor fields agree on every overlap: the restricted connection is the same, and the curvature operator and metric contractions contain no . They therefore define a unique smooth tensor on , even if is not time-orientable. In that case define the spatial density read from the time-time component
where any with may be used. This is well-defined: the metric is the pullback of spatial functions, so its coordinate curvature components, and hence , are constant on each fiber of , including when that fiber is disconnected. It has units ; it is a coordinate-component density and is not thereby the dust rest-mass density.
(d) Scope. This item fixes a class of metric families and the vocabulary of the weak-field bridge: the spatial factorization, component form, stationarity, spatial derivative bounds, potential, and the equation that upgrades the data to an Einstein family. The stationarity condition gives by the local translation pullback, independently of any time orientation. It asserts neither existence for prescribed data nor that is timelike, that the inverse metrics are uniformly bounded, or that is positive; the latter properties are consequences proved separately where they are used. The family is an explicit input-family hypothesis: neither its existence for prescribed Newtonian initial data nor its construction from other data is claimed. The physical reading of the components, of , of and of belongs to the framework's postulates and unit conventions, which are separate items.
Depends on
The flat model spacetime: the Minkowski metric on R^4 and its inertial chart
Smooth covariant 2-tensor fields on a smooth manifold
Smooth time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifolds: the geometric objects of the model
Metric compatibility, torsion freedom and the metric-selected connection class
Existence and uniqueness of the metric-selected connection of a nondegenerate metric, and its extension to tensor fields
The Riemann curvature operator and the derived Ricci, scalar and Einstein tensors
Killing fields of a Lorentzian metric
and smooth maps between smooth manifolds
Invertible matrices and the general linear group
Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Sources
- S. M. Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/9712019v1 (1997), Ch. 4: the weak-field, static, slow-motion conditions g_{00}=-(1+2Phi), spatial metric (1-2Phi) delta_{ij} and the Newtonian limit, printed pp. 105-112 (PDF pp. 112-119)
- D. Tong, General Relativity (Cambridge Part III Mathematical Tripos, Michaelmas 2019), sections 5.1-5.1.2: the stationary weak-field ansatz g = eta + h with h_{00}=-2Phi, h_{ij}=-2Phi delta_{ij} and the Newtonian limit, printed pp. 205-210 (PDF pp. 212-217)
- H. S. Reall, Part III General Relativity (Cambridge, October 12, 2022 revision), section 7.2: weak fields, slow motion and the Newtonian potential, equations (7.19)-(7.36), printed pp. 74-77 (PDF pp. 75-78); the uniform stationary-family bounds here are local hypotheses