Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-11-04 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

General-group characteristic refinement data

Statement

Assume full AC, fix an integer k≥1, and let M be a finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold without boundary. Let G be a finite-dimensional real Lie group with Lie algebra g, and choose a classifying space BG with universal principal G-bundle EG→BG. A smooth principal G-bundle P→M is a smooth right G-action on P for which P→M is locally equivariantly isomorphic to U×G→U; a classifying map fP:M→BG classifies its underlying bundle, and c(P):=fP∗c for c∈Hk(BG;Z). A principal connection is a g-valued one-form A∈Ω1(P;g) with Rg∗A=Ad⁡g−1A and A(ξP)=ξ for every g∈G, ξ∈g, and fundamental vector field ξP. Its curvature is FA=dA+12[A∧A].

For even k=2m, choose an Ad⁡(G)-invariant symmetric polynomial p∈(Smg∗)G with a fixed real normalization, including all 2πi factors. Its evaluation p(FA,…,FA) is a scalar form on P; require it to be basic (horizontal and right-G-invariant), and define ω∈Ω2m(M) as its unique descended form. For odd k, set ω=0. Require ω to be closed and [ω]dR=c(P)R. A general-group characteristic refinement datum additionally specifies a degree-k differential character c^(P,A)∈H^k(M;Z) with I(c^)=c(P) and R(c^)=ω. This is supplied compatible data, not an existence or uniqueness assertion for arbitrary G.

If c and p are pulled back from a unitary representation G→U(r) and its normalized Chern–Weil polynomial, the unitary-group result applies to that pulled-back pair. For fixed compatible c(P) and ω, any two supplied refinements differ by an element of ker⁡I∩ker⁡R≅HdRk−1(M;R)/im⁡(Hk−1(M;Z)→HdRk−1(M;R)). The torsion part of c(P) is invisible to real curvature; any desired flat torsion refinement must be separately specified.

Definition

The image c(P)R is induced by Z↪R, and p(FA,…,FA) means evaluation of the symmetric m-linear polynomial on the curvature m times. If p(FA,…,FA) fails to be basic, closed, or compatible with c(P)R, no datum of the stated type has been supplied. Compatibility is an explicit hypothesis; the cited Chern–Weil suppliers cover their own stated classical vector-bundle scope and do not establish arbitrary-G existence. The ambiguity among supplied refinements with fixed I and R is described in Ambiguity of a differential refinement with fixed characteristic class and curvature.

Remarks

The Chern–Weil compatibility supplier Characteristic forms represent topological characteristic classes over the reals covers its stated classical characteristic forms, not arbitrary invariant polynomials or arbitrary integral classes. Compatibility is therefore an explicit hypothesis of this interface. No arbitrary-G existence theorem is asserted.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources